From inequality to oligarchy: Commentary on The Greatest of All Plagues

David Lay Williams's The Greatest of All Plagues is a pathbreaking contribution to political theory. Spanning seven canonical thinkers, from Plato to Marx, the book maintains remarkable cohesiveness, showing that, despite their ideological differences, these thinkers converged in a set of common concerns about inequality. In this commentary, I argue that Williams risks obscuring two connected, but distinct phenomena: “inequality” and “oligarchy.” Without discounting the latter, Williams’ genealogy focuses primarily on the former. This focus on “inequality” over “oligarchy” has important implications for the critical insights he derives from his historical archive. Because oligarchy, as a political problem, is not reducible to ethical critiques of inequality, then a critical theory of oligarchy must push farther, beyond the range of Williams’ important book.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Theory
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851261489523
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From inequality to oligarchy: Commentary on The Greatest of All Plagues

Gordon Arlen
European Journal of Political Theory
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

From inequality to oligarchy: Commentary on The Greatest of All Plagues

Gordon Arlen
article en

Abstract

David Lay Williams's The Greatest of All Plagues is a pathbreaking contribution to political theory. Spanning seven canonical thinkers, from Plato to Marx, the book maintains remarkable cohesiveness, showing that, despite their ideological differences, these thinkers converged in a set of common concerns about inequality. In this commentary, I argue that Williams risks obscuring two connected, but distinct phenomena: “inequality” and “oligarchy.” Without discounting the latter, Williams’ genealogy focuses primarily on the former. This focus on “inequality” over “oligarchy” has important implications for the critical insights he derives from his historical archive. Because oligarchy, as a political problem, is not reducible to ethical critiques of inequality, then a critical theory of oligarchy must push farther, beyond the range of Williams’ important book.

European Journal of Political Theory
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.