Artificial Intelligence and democracy: A Delphi Study Into Opportunities and Threats

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) penetrates all sectors of society, academic attention to its relationship with democracy is rapidly increasing, leading to a growing body of literature. Optimists expect AI to strengthen democracy, while pessimists argue that it may undermine its essential features. Yet, the analysis of the relation between AI and democracy often remains fuzzy, fragmented, and focused on a narrow range of topics. Therefore, this study aims to provide a systematic understanding of the AI–democracy interplay. A basic framework with four dimensions of democracy – comprising four Ps: Polity, Politics, Policy, and Polis – is introduced to structure expert opinions about the potential opportunities and threats that AI poses for democracy over the next five to ten years. Thirty experts contributed to a Delphi survey, and the analysis shows that the 4Ps framework offers a valuable way to organize the AI–democracy debate, allowing for nuance and less obvious aspects. While, similar to the literature, experts generally identified more threats than opportunities, the survey identifies various opportunities to strengthen democracy that quite absent in debates. In addition, the Delphi survey brings to the fore a fifth P – Performance – which involves a general addition to the basic framework – and emphasizes the (in)ability of the democratic system to solve citizens’ problems and to generate desirable results. As such, this article provides both an empirical diagnosis of the relation between AI and democracy, and a potential agenda for further actions to preserve and strengthen democracy. This article contributes to the literature in three ways: by offering a novel framework to structure the fuzzy AI–democracy debate across its different dimensions; by surfacing less obvious and underexplored aspects of this interaction through a Delphi expert survey; and by moving beyond a predominantly risk-focused perspective in AI governance to also consider an array of opportunities AI adoption may create for democracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Polity
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261492066
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and democracy: A Delphi Study Into Opportunities and Threats

Jasper Kars, Albert Jacob Meijer, Maarten Hillebrandt
Information Polity
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence and democracy: A Delphi Study Into Opportunities and Threats

Jasper Kars, Albert Jacob Meijer, Maarten Hillebrandt
article en

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) penetrates all sectors of society, academic attention to its relationship with democracy is rapidly increasing, leading to a growing body of literature. Optimists expect AI to strengthen democracy, while pessimists argue that it may undermine its essential features. Yet, the analysis of the relation between AI and democracy often remains fuzzy, fragmented, and focused on a narrow range of topics. Therefore, this study aims to provide a systematic understanding of the AI–democracy interplay. A basic framework with four dimensions of democracy – comprising four Ps: Polity, Politics, Policy, and Polis – is introduced to structure expert opinions about the potential opportunities and threats that AI poses for democracy over the next five to ten years. Thirty experts contributed to a Delphi survey, and the analysis shows that the 4Ps framework offers a valuable way to organize the AI–democracy debate, allowing for nuance and less obvious aspects. While, similar to the literature, experts generally identified more threats than opportunities, the survey identifies various opportunities to strengthen democracy that quite absent in debates. In addition, the Delphi survey brings to the fore a fifth P – Performance – which involves a general addition to the basic framework – and emphasizes the (in)ability of the democratic system to solve citizens’ problems and to generate desirable results. As such, this article provides both an empirical diagnosis of the relation between AI and democracy, and a potential agenda for further actions to preserve and strengthen democracy. This article contributes to the literature in three ways: by offering a novel framework to structure the fuzzy AI–democracy debate across its different dimensions; by surfacing less obvious and underexplored aspects of this interaction through a Delphi expert survey; and by moving beyond a predominantly risk-focused perspective in AI governance to also consider an array of opportunities AI adoption may create for democracy.

Information Polity
Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence and democracy: A Delphi Study Into Opportunities and Threats — Jasper Kars, Albert Jacob Meijer, et al. · Information Polity (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS