Meter‐Scale Roughness of the Lunar Surface

Abstract Small‐scale surface roughness is a key indicator of local geological processes, yet it has not previously been mapped globally on the Moon. We present global meter‐scale surface roughness maps generated from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter pulses, which record information about surface undulations within the instrument's ∼5 m individual footprint. Our mapping reveals signatures of recent surface modification, including rough Copernican‐aged impact craters, and steep crater walls consistent with active mass wasting. At the poles, permanently shadowed regions are smoother than nearby sunlit areas, consistent with possible near‐surface ice, and Artemis III candidate landing regions exhibit diverse roughness conditions. These maps complement existing longer‐baseline roughness products, provide constraints for interpreting radar remote sensing observations, capture topographic variability at spatial scales relevant to surface missions, and reveal recent modification of the lunar surface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl122440
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meter‐Scale Roughness of the Lunar Surface

Indujaa Ganesh, Hephzibah Christopher
Geophysical Research Letters
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Meter‐Scale Roughness of the Lunar Surface

Indujaa Ganesh, Hephzibah Christopher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Small‐scale surface roughness is a key indicator of local geological processes, yet it has not previously been mapped globally on the Moon. We present global meter‐scale surface roughness maps generated from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter pulses, which record information about surface undulations within the instrument's ∼5 m individual footprint. Our mapping reveals signatures of recent surface modification, including rough Copernican‐aged impact craters, and steep crater walls consistent with active mass wasting. At the poles, permanently shadowed regions are smoother than nearby sunlit areas, consistent with possible near‐surface ice, and Artemis III candidate landing regions exhibit diverse roughness conditions. These maps complement existing longer‐baseline roughness products, provide constraints for interpreting radar remote sensing observations, capture topographic variability at spatial scales relevant to surface missions, and reveal recent modification of the lunar surface.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(19)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meter‐Scale Roughness of the Lunar Surface — Indujaa Ganesh, Hephzibah Christopher · Geophysical Research Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS