Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Sepsis Patients on Norepinephrine: A Target Trial Emulation

Background The optimal timing for initiating vasopressin in septic shock remains uncertain, with conflicting evidence potentially arising from variations in patient severity and methodological limitations such as immortal time bias. This study aimed to evaluate the time-varying effect of early vasopressin initiation across a spectrum of baseline norepinephrine dose requirements. Methods We included 5461 patients with septic shock from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database. A target trial emulation framework was applied, using a clone-censor-weight approach with inverse probability of censoring weighting to address immortal time bias. The primary and secondary outcomes were 14-day and 28-day all-cause mortality. Time-varying treatment effects of early vasopressin initiation (defined by a 1-h primary grace period) were assessed via piecewise landmark Cox models, with analyses stratified by baseline norepinephrine equivalent dose thresholds (>0.1, >0.25, >0.5, and >0.75 μg/kg/min). Results The association between early vasopressin initiation and 28-day mortality varied by both baseline norepinephrine dose and time since initiation. Among patients with low-to-moderate shock severity (NE 0.1-0.5 μg/kg/min), a pattern of delayed benefit was observed. The absolute risk reduction in the broad >0.1 μg/kg/min cohort was not statistically significant, but a survival benefit emerged in the late phase for the >0.25 μg/kg/min subgroup (late-phase HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97, P=.018). In contrast, for patients with more severe shock (NE >0.5 μg/kg/min), early initiation was associated with increased risk in the first 48 h. This early hazard was most pronounced in the >0.75 μg/kg/min subgroup, where the point estimate for short-term mortality was markedly elevated (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.68-4.90, P<.001). Although long-term point estimates at higher thresholds favored vasopressin, the confidence intervals were extremely wide and crossed the null, precluding firm conclusions. Subgroup analyses suggested that older age and concomitant renal dysfunction might amplify susceptibility to higher early mortality. Conclusion In this target trial emulation, the benefit of early vasopressin initiation appeared dependent on baseline shock severity. The findings suggest a potential therapeutic window at norepinephrine equivalent doses between 0.1 and 0.5 μg/kg/min, with the most consistent benefit around 0.25 μg/kg/min. For patients requiring >0.5 μg/kg/min, early initiation was associated with higher early mortality, which may reflect residual confounding by shock severity rather than a direct causal harm, and the current analysis did not support a definitive compensatory long-term survival benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666261479700
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Sepsis Patients on Norepinephrine: A Target Trial Emulation

Yuanqi Gong, Qianyu Yuan, Xue Wu, Xinghe Shangguan et al.
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Sepsis Patients on Norepinephrine: A Target Trial Emulation

Yuanqi Gong, Qianyu Yuan, Xue Wu, Xinghe Shangguan, Xiao Zhang, Puxiu Liu, Xiaofan Zou, Yang Zhou
article en

Abstract

Background The optimal timing for initiating vasopressin in septic shock remains uncertain, with conflicting evidence potentially arising from variations in patient severity and methodological limitations such as immortal time bias. This study aimed to evaluate the time-varying effect of early vasopressin initiation across a spectrum of baseline norepinephrine dose requirements. Methods We included 5461 patients with septic shock from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database. A target trial emulation framework was applied, using a clone-censor-weight approach with inverse probability of censoring weighting to address immortal time bias. The primary and secondary outcomes were 14-day and 28-day all-cause mortality. Time-varying treatment effects of early vasopressin initiation (defined by a 1-h primary grace period) were assessed via piecewise landmark Cox models, with analyses stratified by baseline norepinephrine equivalent dose thresholds (>0.1, >0.25, >0.5, and >0.75 μg/kg/min). Results The association between early vasopressin initiation and 28-day mortality varied by both baseline norepinephrine dose and time since initiation. Among patients with low-to-moderate shock severity (NE 0.1-0.5 μg/kg/min), a pattern of delayed benefit was observed. The absolute risk reduction in the broad >0.1 μg/kg/min cohort was not statistically significant, but a survival benefit emerged in the late phase for the >0.25 μg/kg/min subgroup (late-phase HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97, P=.018). In contrast, for patients with more severe shock (NE >0.5 μg/kg/min), early initiation was associated with increased risk in the first 48 h. This early hazard was most pronounced in the >0.75 μg/kg/min subgroup, where the point estimate for short-term mortality was markedly elevated (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.68-4.90, P<.001). Although long-term point estimates at higher thresholds favored vasopressin, the confidence intervals were extremely wide and crossed the null, precluding firm conclusions. Subgroup analyses suggested that older age and concomitant renal dysfunction might amplify susceptibility to higher early mortality. Conclusion In this target trial emulation, the benefit of early vasopressin initiation appeared dependent on baseline shock severity. The findings suggest a potential therapeutic window at norepinephrine equivalent doses between 0.1 and 0.5 μg/kg/min, with the most consistent benefit around 0.25 μg/kg/min. For patients requiring >0.5 μg/kg/min, early initiation was associated with higher early mortality, which may reflect residual confounding by shock severity rather than a direct causal harm, and the current analysis did not support a definitive compensatory long-term survival benefit.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Nanchang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.