Feasibility of a standardized three-dose intravenous tranexamic acid protocol in bariatric surgery: a pilot study

Abstract Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been increasingly evaluated in bariatric surgery; however, heterogeneity remains in dosing and timing, and the feasibility of implementing a standardized multidose regimen in routine practice is not well established. This pilot study evaluated implementation of a standardized three-dose intravenous TXA protocol in metabolic bariatric surgery. Methods This prospective, sequential-period pilot study included 1077 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or revisional surgery during alternating 3-month TXA and non-TXA periods. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by recruitment, protocol adherence, and completeness of 30-day outcome ascertainment. Postoperative bleeding, operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and thromboembolic events were evaluated exploratorily. Bleeding was assessed using Firth penalized logistic regression under intention-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated frameworks. Results Of 1,122 patients screened, 1077 were enrolled (96.0%; 95% CI 94.7–97.1%). Overall adherence to period-assigned treatment was 94.5% (95% CI 93.0–95.8%); all patients initiating TXA completed the three-dose regimen, and 30-day outcome ascertainment was 100.0% (95% CI 99.7–100.0%). Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 1.46% of patients assigned to TXA periods vs. 2.84% assigned to non-TXA periods ( p = 0.174). In ITT analysis, TXA allocation was not significantly associated with bleeding among SG patients (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.10–2.53; p = 0.449), whereas anastomotic procedures had higher bleeding odds than SG (OR 5.41; 95% CI 1.86–18.64; p = 0.002). No treatment-by-procedure interaction was identified ( p = 0.985). OT and LOS were similar between groups, and no 30-day thromboembolic events occurred. Conclusion Implementation of a standardized three-dose intravenous TXA protocol was feasible within routine bariatric surgical practice, with high adherence and complete outcome ascertainment. Given the low bleeding event rate observed in this pilot, adequately powered studies are needed to determine whether TXA meaningfully reduces postoperative bleeding and whether its effect differs by procedure type.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13494-x
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of a standardized three-dose intravenous tranexamic acid protocol in bariatric surgery: a pilot study

Arturo Estrada, Tiwalade Adediji, Ya Zhou, Joseph Vazzana et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Blood transfusion and management
article

Feasibility of a standardized three-dose intravenous tranexamic acid protocol in bariatric surgery: a pilot study

Arturo Estrada, Tiwalade Adediji, Ya Zhou, Joseph Vazzana, Jason Xia, Raquel Nogueira, Diego Lima, Paola Llamuca-Castro, Jenny Choi, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Erin Moran-Atkin, Diego Camacho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been increasingly evaluated in bariatric surgery; however, heterogeneity remains in dosing and timing, and the feasibility of implementing a standardized multidose regimen in routine practice is not well established. This pilot study evaluated implementation of a standardized three-dose intravenous TXA protocol in metabolic bariatric surgery. Methods This prospective, sequential-period pilot study included 1077 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or revisional surgery during alternating 3-month TXA and non-TXA periods. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed by recruitment, protocol adherence, and completeness of 30-day outcome ascertainment. Postoperative bleeding, operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and thromboembolic events were evaluated exploratorily. Bleeding was assessed using Firth penalized logistic regression under intention-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated frameworks. Results Of 1,122 patients screened, 1077 were enrolled (96.0%; 95% CI 94.7–97.1%). Overall adherence to period-assigned treatment was 94.5% (95% CI 93.0–95.8%); all patients initiating TXA completed the three-dose regimen, and 30-day outcome ascertainment was 100.0% (95% CI 99.7–100.0%). Clinically significant bleeding occurred in 1.46% of patients assigned to TXA periods vs. 2.84% assigned to non-TXA periods ( p = 0.174). In ITT analysis, TXA allocation was not significantly associated with bleeding among SG patients (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.10–2.53; p = 0.449), whereas anastomotic procedures had higher bleeding odds than SG (OR 5.41; 95% CI 1.86–18.64; p = 0.002). No treatment-by-procedure interaction was identified ( p = 0.985). OT and LOS were similar between groups, and no 30-day thromboembolic events occurred. Conclusion Implementation of a standardized three-dose intravenous TXA protocol was feasible within routine bariatric surgical practice, with high adherence and complete outcome ascertainment. Given the low bleeding event rate observed in this pilot, adequately powered studies are needed to determine whether TXA meaningfully reduces postoperative bleeding and whether its effect differs by procedure type.

Surgical Endoscopy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Blood transfusion and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.