High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences

Abstract TFIID is instrumental in recognizing promoter sequences and initiating transcription, yet a cohesive understanding of how this complex engages and functions at different promoter types in vivo is still lacking. Here, we employed ChIP-nexus to capture high-resolution binding footprints of all Drosophila TFIID subunits across the genome. These footprints reveal TFIID sub-modules whose DNA contacts agree with cryo-EM structures and point to new structural details. At different promoter types, the footprints of the TAFs are very similar, suggestive of the same engaged TFIID conformation. In contrast, the binding profile of TBP is promoter-specific, enabling us to identify TATA, DPR, and TCT/housekeeping promoters de novo, along with their underlying core promoter elements. Notably, TATA promoters display specific TBP and NC2 binding footprints and reduced TAF occupancy, consistent with a fraction of transcripts being initiated in a TAF-independent manner at these promoters in vivo. Together, our results provide a comprehensive resource for linking structural and biochemical results to in vivo data and offer a potential explanation for the increased burst size observed at TATA promoters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77758-9
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences

Julia Zeitlinger, Melanie Weilert, Sergio G-M Alcantara, Simon Bourdareau
Nature Communications
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
article

High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences

Julia Zeitlinger, Melanie Weilert, Sergio G-M Alcantara, Simon Bourdareau
article en

Abstract

Abstract TFIID is instrumental in recognizing promoter sequences and initiating transcription, yet a cohesive understanding of how this complex engages and functions at different promoter types in vivo is still lacking. Here, we employed ChIP-nexus to capture high-resolution binding footprints of all Drosophila TFIID subunits across the genome. These footprints reveal TFIID sub-modules whose DNA contacts agree with cryo-EM structures and point to new structural details. At different promoter types, the footprints of the TAFs are very similar, suggestive of the same engaged TFIID conformation. In contrast, the binding profile of TBP is promoter-specific, enabling us to identify TATA, DPR, and TCT/housekeeping promoters de novo, along with their underlying core promoter elements. Notably, TATA promoters display specific TBP and NC2 binding footprints and reduced TAF occupancy, consistent with a fraction of transcripts being initiated in a TAF-independent manner at these promoters in vivo. Together, our results provide a comprehensive resource for linking structural and biochemical results to in vivo data and offer a potential explanation for the increased burst size observed at TATA promoters.

Nature Communications
Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

High-resolution binding data of TFIID and cofactors show promoter-specific differences — Julia Zeitlinger, Melanie Weilert, et al. · Nature Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS