Regional Hypertrophy of the Gluteal Muscles Is Task-Specific: Differential Responses to 10 Weeks of Hip Extension Versus Hip Abduction Training

Abstract Attarieh, P, Nunes, JP, Khani, S, Moniri, A, Goli, A, Negahdar, S, Mohammadinia, F, Fallah, MH, and Shahrbanian, S. Regional hypertrophy of the gluteal muscles is task-specific: Differential responses to 10 weeks of hip extension versus hip abduction training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The gluteal muscles are a common target in strength and rehabilitation settings, yet the influence of exercise selection on their hypertrophic responses remains poorly understood. This study compared the effects of 10 weeks of unilateral cable-based hip extension (HExt) vs. hip abduction (HAbd) resistance training on gluteal muscle size and maximal strength. In a within-subject study, 17 young adults (28.3 ± 4.3 y) completed a 10-week program (2×/wk; ∼10 sets/wk, 8–12RM), with each leg randomly assigned to HExt or HAbd, balanced for limb dominance. Hypertrophy was assessed through magnetic resonance imaging, quantifying cross-sectional area (CSA) changes in proximal, middle, and distal regions of the gluteus maximus (GMax) and gluteus medius plus minimus (GMed + GMin). Maximal strength was assessed using 1 repetition maximum (1RM) tests for HExt and HAbd exercises. Both exercises elicited significant pre-to-post increases in overall GMax CSA, but HExt produced greater gains (9 vs. 5%) and a distal-dominant growth pattern (proximal: 5%, middle: 8%, distal: 14%), while HAbd produced a proximal-dominant pattern (proximal: 10%, middle: 4%, distal: 1%). Moreover, HExt produced greater effects on GMax than GMed + GMin (9 vs. 2%), whereas HAbd elicited comparable effects across both muscle groups (5 vs. 4%). Hip extension 1RM gains favored HExt (40 vs. 23%), and HAbd 1RM gains favored HAbd (35 vs. 17%). In conclusion, HExt produced greater overall GMax hypertrophy with a distal-dominant pattern and no significant GMed + GMin increase, while HAbd elicited a proximal-dominant GMax growth pattern and a small GMed + GMin effect, providing the first direct indication that varying exercises can modulate regional gluteal hypertrophy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005701
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Hypertrophy of the Gluteal Muscles Is Task-Specific: Differential Responses to 10 Weeks of Hip Extension Versus Hip Abduction Training

Shahnaz Shahrbanian, Saeed Khani, João Pedro Nunes, Amirali Goli et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Regional Hypertrophy of the Gluteal Muscles Is Task-Specific: Differential Responses to 10 Weeks of Hip Extension Versus Hip Abduction Training

Shahnaz Shahrbanian, Saeed Khani, João Pedro Nunes, Amirali Goli, Parsa Attarieh, Saman Negahdar, Mohammad H. Fallah, Fatemeh Mohammadinia, Aeen Moniri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Attarieh, P, Nunes, JP, Khani, S, Moniri, A, Goli, A, Negahdar, S, Mohammadinia, F, Fallah, MH, and Shahrbanian, S. Regional hypertrophy of the gluteal muscles is task-specific: Differential responses to 10 weeks of hip extension versus hip abduction training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—The gluteal muscles are a common target in strength and rehabilitation settings, yet the influence of exercise selection on their hypertrophic responses remains poorly understood. This study compared the effects of 10 weeks of unilateral cable-based hip extension (HExt) vs. hip abduction (HAbd) resistance training on gluteal muscle size and maximal strength. In a within-subject study, 17 young adults (28.3 ± 4.3 y) completed a 10-week program (2×/wk; ∼10 sets/wk, 8–12RM), with each leg randomly assigned to HExt or HAbd, balanced for limb dominance. Hypertrophy was assessed through magnetic resonance imaging, quantifying cross-sectional area (CSA) changes in proximal, middle, and distal regions of the gluteus maximus (GMax) and gluteus medius plus minimus (GMed + GMin). Maximal strength was assessed using 1 repetition maximum (1RM) tests for HExt and HAbd exercises. Both exercises elicited significant pre-to-post increases in overall GMax CSA, but HExt produced greater gains (9 vs. 5%) and a distal-dominant growth pattern (proximal: 5%, middle: 8%, distal: 14%), while HAbd produced a proximal-dominant pattern (proximal: 10%, middle: 4%, distal: 1%). Moreover, HExt produced greater effects on GMax than GMed + GMin (9 vs. 2%), whereas HAbd elicited comparable effects across both muscle groups (5 vs. 4%). Hip extension 1RM gains favored HExt (40 vs. 23%), and HAbd 1RM gains favored HAbd (35 vs. 17%). In conclusion, HExt produced greater overall GMax hypertrophy with a distal-dominant pattern and no significant GMed + GMin increase, while HAbd elicited a proximal-dominant GMax growth pattern and a small GMed + GMin effect, providing the first direct indication that varying exercises can modulate regional gluteal hypertrophy.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Edith Cowan University (AU), Tarbiat Modares University (IR), Kharazmi University (IR), University of Tehran (IR), Shahid Beheshti University (IR), University of Mazandaran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.