From Strategic Bombing to Precision Strike: Continuity and Adaptation in Infrastructure Targeting

Infrastructure targeting has been a recurrent feature of modern warfare, but its history does not represent a linear transition from isolated targets to the discovery of interdependence. Interwar air-power theorists, particularly at the Air Corps Tactical School, already treated industrial economies as networks of vulnerable nodes. This article compares six cases: the Second World War, Cold War targeting doctrine, Vietnam, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Allied Force and Ukraine. It argues that the underlying targeting logic remained broadly continuous, while surveillance, target selection, weapon accuracy and reach, political control and multidomain integration changed. The cases trace its wartime testing, Cold War institutionalisation, limits in Vietnam, precision application in Desert Storm, constrained adaptation in Kosovo and contemporary multidomain use in Ukraine. The article links the histories of strategic bombing, air power, precision strike and infrastructure warfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
War in History
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445261495423
Primary Topic
Military Technology and Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Strategic Bombing to Precision Strike: Continuity and Adaptation in Infrastructure Targeting

Ondrej Voznak
War in History
Military Technology and Strategies
article

From Strategic Bombing to Precision Strike: Continuity and Adaptation in Infrastructure Targeting

Ondrej Voznak
article en

Abstract

Infrastructure targeting has been a recurrent feature of modern warfare, but its history does not represent a linear transition from isolated targets to the discovery of interdependence. Interwar air-power theorists, particularly at the Air Corps Tactical School, already treated industrial economies as networks of vulnerable nodes. This article compares six cases: the Second World War, Cold War targeting doctrine, Vietnam, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Allied Force and Ukraine. It argues that the underlying targeting logic remained broadly continuous, while surveillance, target selection, weapon accuracy and reach, political control and multidomain integration changed. The cases trace its wartime testing, Cold War institutionalisation, limits in Vietnam, precision application in Desert Storm, constrained adaptation in Kosovo and contemporary multidomain use in Ukraine. The article links the histories of strategic bombing, air power, precision strike and infrastructure warfare.

War in History
University of Defence (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Military Technology and Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Strategic Bombing to Precision Strike: Continuity and Adaptation in Infrastructure Targeting — Ondrej Voznak · War in History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS