Criminal dismemberments: Victim, suspect, and incident attributes of decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides

Abstract Using cases of criminal dismemberment in the CDC's National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), we directly compared decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides. We also explored clusters of victim, suspect, and incident variables, including how decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides fit within the clusters. Victims who were only decapitated were more likely to be recovered in a residence and were more likely to be the suspect's child or other relative. Additionally, decapitated‐only victims were more likely to be a juvenile. Victims of decapitation‐only homicides were more likely to be linked to a suspect who was on scene when first responders arrived or was in acute mental health crisis compared with homicides in which the victims were dismembered. Dismemberment homicides were more likely to involve multiple suspects, movement of the body from the homicide location, or concealment of the body (burial, wrapping/placement of the body into a container). Adult victims under the age of 65 were more likely to be dismembered. The cluster analysis yielded results consistent with the direct comparison and identified a third cluster of incidents involving intimate partner violence between current/former romantic partners. Our findings highlight the utilitarian nature of most criminal dismemberments and counter stereotypes of offenders who target strangers or dismember while experiencing mental illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70487
Primary Topic
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal dismemberments: Victim, suspect, and incident attributes of decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides

Jan Kum, Michelle C. Huffman, Taylor E. Burd, Emma K. Goldsby et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
article

Criminal dismemberments: Victim, suspect, and incident attributes of decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides

Jan Kum, Michelle C. Huffman, Taylor E. Burd, Emma K. Goldsby, Lindsey Bellomy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using cases of criminal dismemberment in the CDC's National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS), we directly compared decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides. We also explored clusters of victim, suspect, and incident variables, including how decapitation‐only and dismemberment homicides fit within the clusters. Victims who were only decapitated were more likely to be recovered in a residence and were more likely to be the suspect's child or other relative. Additionally, decapitated‐only victims were more likely to be a juvenile. Victims of decapitation‐only homicides were more likely to be linked to a suspect who was on scene when first responders arrived or was in acute mental health crisis compared with homicides in which the victims were dismembered. Dismemberment homicides were more likely to involve multiple suspects, movement of the body from the homicide location, or concealment of the body (burial, wrapping/placement of the body into a container). Adult victims under the age of 65 were more likely to be dismembered. The cluster analysis yielded results consistent with the direct comparison and identified a third cluster of incidents involving intimate partner violence between current/former romantic partners. Our findings highlight the utilitarian nature of most criminal dismemberments and counter stereotypes of offenders who target strangers or dismember while experiencing mental illness.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
Drug Enforcement Administration (US), Federal Bureau of Investigation (US), Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.