Socio‐Technical Risk‐Informed AI‐Driven Automation Trustworthiness Evaluation (ST‐RATE): Part 1‐Conceptualization

ABSTRACT The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven technologies into nuclear power plant (NPP) operations and maintenance holds significant potential to enhance safety, operational efficiency, and reliability. However, deploying such AI‐driven automation technologies in high‐consequence settings requires a rigorous, traceable, and risk‐informed evaluation of their trustworthiness. Although researchers across various domains have proposed definitions and metrics for AI‐driven automation trustworthiness, no agreed‐upon formal or quantitative method exists that is suitable for the highly regulated nuclear sector. To address this gap, this paper, the first in a two‐part series, presents three contributions: (I) a cross‐disciplinary literature review that categorizes existing definitions and evaluation methodologies for AI‐driven automation trustworthiness and identifies their inherent limitations with respect to applicability in the nuclear domain; (II) develops a new definition of AI‐driven automation trustworthiness as “the degree of confidence that the AI‐driven automation system will function as expected across its conditions of use” to address the limitations identified in Contribution I; and (III) building on the new definition, conceptualizes the Socio‐Technical Risk‐informed AI‐driven Automation Trustworthiness Evaluation (ST‐RATE) methodology, grounded in three foundational pillars: (a) risk‐informed performance expectations, (b) socio‐technical context across operational conditions, and (c) uncertainty‐based trustworthiness evaluation. While developed primarily for the nuclear domain, the definition and ST‐RATE methodology has the potential to be adapted for other safety‐critical domains with appropriate modifications. The ST‐RATE methodological framework is operationalized and demonstrated through an AI‐driven automated firewatch case study in a companion paper (Companion paper Part 2, 2025). ST‐RATE is the first‐of‐its‐kind methodology that enables risk‐informed and uncertainty‐based quantification of trustworthiness despite limited empirical data and without over‐reliance on subjective expert judgment, addressing the key limitations of existing approaches identified in the literature review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70367
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio‐Technical Risk‐Informed AI‐Driven Automation Trustworthiness Evaluation (ST‐RATE): Part 1‐Conceptualization

Muhammad Hammad Khalid, Zahra Mohaghegh, Ha Bui, Ahmad Al Rashdan
Risk Analysis
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Socio‐Technical Risk‐Informed AI‐Driven Automation Trustworthiness Evaluation (ST‐RATE): Part 1‐Conceptualization

Muhammad Hammad Khalid, Zahra Mohaghegh, Ha Bui, Ahmad Al Rashdan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI)‐driven technologies into nuclear power plant (NPP) operations and maintenance holds significant potential to enhance safety, operational efficiency, and reliability. However, deploying such AI‐driven automation technologies in high‐consequence settings requires a rigorous, traceable, and risk‐informed evaluation of their trustworthiness. Although researchers across various domains have proposed definitions and metrics for AI‐driven automation trustworthiness, no agreed‐upon formal or quantitative method exists that is suitable for the highly regulated nuclear sector. To address this gap, this paper, the first in a two‐part series, presents three contributions: (I) a cross‐disciplinary literature review that categorizes existing definitions and evaluation methodologies for AI‐driven automation trustworthiness and identifies their inherent limitations with respect to applicability in the nuclear domain; (II) develops a new definition of AI‐driven automation trustworthiness as “the degree of confidence that the AI‐driven automation system will function as expected across its conditions of use” to address the limitations identified in Contribution I; and (III) building on the new definition, conceptualizes the Socio‐Technical Risk‐informed AI‐driven Automation Trustworthiness Evaluation (ST‐RATE) methodology, grounded in three foundational pillars: (a) risk‐informed performance expectations, (b) socio‐technical context across operational conditions, and (c) uncertainty‐based trustworthiness evaluation. While developed primarily for the nuclear domain, the definition and ST‐RATE methodology has the potential to be adapted for other safety‐critical domains with appropriate modifications. The ST‐RATE methodological framework is operationalized and demonstrated through an AI‐driven automated firewatch case study in a companion paper (Companion paper Part 2, 2025). ST‐RATE is the first‐of‐its‐kind methodology that enables risk‐informed and uncertainty‐based quantification of trustworthiness despite limited empirical data and without over‐reliance on subjective expert judgment, addressing the key limitations of existing approaches identified in the literature review.

Risk AnalysisVol. 46(11)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Idaho National Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.