Effects of Double-Primer Placement on Rock Fragmentation at Kevitsa Open Pit Mine

Abstract To address the lack of systematic production-scale evaluation of the effects of double-primer placement on blasting performance, this study presents a comparative analysis of two primer configurations. The double-primer placement consists of two primers positioned 2 m above the borehole bottom and 2 m below the stemming, respectively, with simultaneous initiation, whereas the conventional middle-primer placement employed a primer positioned at the midpoint of the explosive column. Twelve full-scale production blast experiments were conducted at Kevitsa mine with rock fragmentation and shovel loading rate as performance indicators. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulations were performed to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The experimental results confirmed that the investigated double-primer placement yields finer rock fragmentation than the conventional middle-primer placement across the full range of investigated sizes. Meanwhile, the double-primer placement increases the shovel loading rate by 10.9%, compared to the middle-primer placement. The theoretical analysis indicates that the double-primer placement generates higher pressure loading due to head-on shock-wave collision and greater energy concentration in the surrounding rock, compared to the middle-primer placement. In addition, three-dimensional numerical simulations on bench blasting show that the double-primer placement produces over 300% larger triaxial tension zones with higher stress magnitudes than the middle-primer placement does near the bench face. Given that triaxial tension is more favorable for rock fragmentation than uniaxial tension, it can be concluded that the larger triaxial tensile area generated by the double-primer placement is a significant factor contributing to achieving finer fragmentation, compared to the middle-primer placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-026-06028-3
Primary Topic
Blasting Impact and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Double-Primer Placement on Rock Fragmentation at Kevitsa Open Pit Mine

Riika M. Ylitalo, Pekka Bergström, Zong-Xian Zhang, Sunniva Haugen et al.
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Blasting Impact and Analysis
article

Effects of Double-Primer Placement on Rock Fragmentation at Kevitsa Open Pit Mine

Riika M. Ylitalo, Pekka Bergström, Zong-Xian Zhang, Sunniva Haugen, Li Yuan Chi
article en

Abstract

Abstract To address the lack of systematic production-scale evaluation of the effects of double-primer placement on blasting performance, this study presents a comparative analysis of two primer configurations. The double-primer placement consists of two primers positioned 2 m above the borehole bottom and 2 m below the stemming, respectively, with simultaneous initiation, whereas the conventional middle-primer placement employed a primer positioned at the midpoint of the explosive column. Twelve full-scale production blast experiments were conducted at Kevitsa mine with rock fragmentation and shovel loading rate as performance indicators. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulations were performed to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The experimental results confirmed that the investigated double-primer placement yields finer rock fragmentation than the conventional middle-primer placement across the full range of investigated sizes. Meanwhile, the double-primer placement increases the shovel loading rate by 10.9%, compared to the middle-primer placement. The theoretical analysis indicates that the double-primer placement generates higher pressure loading due to head-on shock-wave collision and greater energy concentration in the surrounding rock, compared to the middle-primer placement. In addition, three-dimensional numerical simulations on bench blasting show that the double-primer placement produces over 300% larger triaxial tension zones with higher stress magnitudes than the middle-primer placement does near the bench face. Given that triaxial tension is more favorable for rock fragmentation than uniaxial tension, it can be concluded that the larger triaxial tensile area generated by the double-primer placement is a significant factor contributing to achieving finer fragmentation, compared to the middle-primer placement.

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Boliden (Sweden) (SE), University of Oulu (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Blasting Impact and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.