Effect of Compensatory Stepping Training Versus Conventional Therapy on Balance Confidence in Older adults with High Risk of Falls: A Comparative Study

Background: Older adults at high risk of falls show impaired change-in-support (compensatory stepping) reactions, and reduced balance confidence both results from and predicts future falls. Task-specific, therapist-applied perturbation training has been proposed to improve reactive balance control, but comparative evidence against conventional balance therapy for balance confidence remains limited, particularly in Indian older adults. Objectives: This report addresses the first three objectives of a larger trial: to determine the effect of (1) Compensatory Stepping Training (CST) and (2) Conventional Therapy on balance confidence at 4 weeks, and (3) to compare the two interventions. Methods: In this two-arm, age-matched comparative study, 218 community-dwelling older adults (60–80 years) with a Timed Up and Go score ≥13.5 s were purposively allocated to Group A (CST, n=109) or Group B (Conventional, n=109). Group A received 4 weeks of therapist-applied multidirectional perturbation training superimposed on functional tasks; Group B received flexibility and functional strengthening exercises alone. Balance confidence was measured with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale at baseline (T1) and 4 weeks (T2). Results: Baseline age, gender, fall history and ABC scores were comparable between groups (all p>.05). ABC scores improved significantly within both groups (Group A: 53.4 to 68.4, +14.9 points, p<.001; Group B: 54.1 to 59.6, +5.5 points, p<.001). The improvement was significantly greater in Group A (p<.001, large effect size). Conclusion: Both interventions improved balance confidence over 4 weeks, but CST produced a substantially larger and clinically more meaningful improvement than conventional therapy in high-risk older adults. Abbreviations ABC: Activities-specific Balance Confidence; CST: Compensatory Stepping Training; TUG: Timed Up and Go; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; SD: Standard Deviation; T1: Baseline; T2: Four Weeks

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of chemical health risks
Published
2026-10-05
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Compensatory Stepping Training Versus Conventional Therapy on Balance Confidence in Older adults with High Risk of Falls: A Comparative Study

Tungikar S Bhattad R
Journal of chemical health risks
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Effect of Compensatory Stepping Training Versus Conventional Therapy on Balance Confidence in Older adults with High Risk of Falls: A Comparative Study

Tungikar S Bhattad R
article en

Abstract

Background: Older adults at high risk of falls show impaired change-in-support (compensatory stepping) reactions, and reduced balance confidence both results from and predicts future falls. Task-specific, therapist-applied perturbation training has been proposed to improve reactive balance control, but comparative evidence against conventional balance therapy for balance confidence remains limited, particularly in Indian older adults. Objectives: This report addresses the first three objectives of a larger trial: to determine the effect of (1) Compensatory Stepping Training (CST) and (2) Conventional Therapy on balance confidence at 4 weeks, and (3) to compare the two interventions. Methods: In this two-arm, age-matched comparative study, 218 community-dwelling older adults (60–80 years) with a Timed Up and Go score ≥13.5 s were purposively allocated to Group A (CST, n=109) or Group B (Conventional, n=109). Group A received 4 weeks of therapist-applied multidirectional perturbation training superimposed on functional tasks; Group B received flexibility and functional strengthening exercises alone. Balance confidence was measured with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale at baseline (T1) and 4 weeks (T2). Results: Baseline age, gender, fall history and ABC scores were comparable between groups (all p>.05). ABC scores improved significantly within both groups (Group A: 53.4 to 68.4, +14.9 points, p<.001; Group B: 54.1 to 59.6, +5.5 points, p<.001). The improvement was significantly greater in Group A (p<.001, large effect size). Conclusion: Both interventions improved balance confidence over 4 weeks, but CST produced a substantially larger and clinically more meaningful improvement than conventional therapy in high-risk older adults. Abbreviations ABC: Activities-specific Balance Confidence; CST: Compensatory Stepping Training; TUG: Timed Up and Go; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; SD: Standard Deviation; T1: Baseline; T2: Four Weeks

Journal of chemical health risks
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Compensatory Stepping Training Versus Conventional Therapy on Balance Confidence in Older adults with High Risk of Falls: A Comparative Study — Tungikar S Bhattad R · Journal of chemical health risks (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS