Assessing variational likelihood estimation in network formation models

Networks are often a useful way to represent complex social and economic systems. Stochastic models for such networks should parsimoniously reflect the complexity while being both interpretable and tractable. The class of Exponential-family Random Graph Models (ERGMs) is very expressive and flexible in its representation of complex phenomena. However, the estimation and fitting of realistic ERGMs are hampered by the computational challenges of likelihood-based inference. Recently, a deterministic method based on a variational mean-field approximation was proposed that is much less expensive to compute than the standard simulation-based method. In this work, we show that the proposed method performs poorly for realistic models. We show that established alternatives, including MCMC-MLE, MPLE, sampled MPLE, and tapered ERGM-based inference, achieve superior accuracy and computational performance in the situations that the mean-field approximation was designed for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358535
Primary Topic
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing variational likelihood estimation in network formation models

Mark S. Handcock, Joseph Resch
PLoS ONE
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
article

Assessing variational likelihood estimation in network formation models

Mark S. Handcock, Joseph Resch
article en

Abstract

Networks are often a useful way to represent complex social and economic systems. Stochastic models for such networks should parsimoniously reflect the complexity while being both interpretable and tractable. The class of Exponential-family Random Graph Models (ERGMs) is very expressive and flexible in its representation of complex phenomena. However, the estimation and fitting of realistic ERGMs are hampered by the computational challenges of likelihood-based inference. Recently, a deterministic method based on a variational mean-field approximation was proposed that is much less expensive to compute than the standard simulation-based method. In this work, we show that the proposed method performs poorly for realistic models. We show that established alternatives, including MCMC-MLE, MPLE, sampled MPLE, and tapered ERGM-based inference, achieve superior accuracy and computational performance in the situations that the mean-field approximation was designed for.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing variational likelihood estimation in network formation models — Mark S. Handcock, Joseph Resch · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS