Investigation of tractor parameters on performance and discrete element method modelling

This study applies the Discrete Element Method (DEM) to quantify the tractive performance of a Goldoni 240 tractor tire under varying operating conditions, including three drive configurations of 4WD, RWD, FWD, three tire inflation pressures of 170, 200, 230 kPa, and three ballast levels of 0, 60, 120 kg, while maintaining a constant drawbar pull of 2 kN. Main objective was to rigorously assess and validate three widely used DEM soil–tire contact models—Hertz–Mindlin (HMCM), Hysteretic Spring (HSCM), and Hertz–Mindlin with JKR adhesion (HMCM–JKR) to determine their suitability for simulating cohesive soil behavior. Field and simulation results showed that the 4WD configuration consistently produced the lowest drive-wheel slip, maintaining values within the agronomically recommended range of 10–15% under the 2 kN load. Increasing inflation pressure resulted in higher slip due to reduced tire–soil contact area across all drive systems; however, 4WD remained less sensitive to inflation pressure, with slip at 230 kPa still lower than that of RWD and FWD at 170 kPa. Ballasting effectively reduced slip, with the 120 kg ballast providing the greatest improvement for all configurations. Model validation showed that the Hysteretic Spring Contact Model (HSCM) exhibited the strongest linear relationship with the experimental measurements among the investigated contact models, with the highest correlation coefficients across the evaluated operating conditions. These results indicate a stronger statistical relationship between the HSCM responses and the experimental observations compared with the HMCM and HMCM–JKR models. However, the regression and ANOVA results are interpreted as measures of relative model performance rather than as evidence of exact numerical agreement between DEM predictions and experimental measurements. Overall, the DEM framework provides a useful numerical approach for investigating tire–soil interaction under the operating conditions considered in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-72574-z
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of tractor parameters on performance and discrete element method modelling

Vali Rasooli Sharabiani, Mariusz Szymanek, Saeed Dehghan, Agata Dziwulska‐Hunek et al.
Scientific Reports
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
article

Investigation of tractor parameters on performance and discrete element method modelling

Vali Rasooli Sharabiani, Mariusz Szymanek, Saeed Dehghan, Agata Dziwulska‐Hunek, Abdolmajid Moinfar, Gholamhossein Shahgholı
article en

Abstract

This study applies the Discrete Element Method (DEM) to quantify the tractive performance of a Goldoni 240 tractor tire under varying operating conditions, including three drive configurations of 4WD, RWD, FWD, three tire inflation pressures of 170, 200, 230 kPa, and three ballast levels of 0, 60, 120 kg, while maintaining a constant drawbar pull of 2 kN. Main objective was to rigorously assess and validate three widely used DEM soil–tire contact models—Hertz–Mindlin (HMCM), Hysteretic Spring (HSCM), and Hertz–Mindlin with JKR adhesion (HMCM–JKR) to determine their suitability for simulating cohesive soil behavior. Field and simulation results showed that the 4WD configuration consistently produced the lowest drive-wheel slip, maintaining values within the agronomically recommended range of 10–15% under the 2 kN load. Increasing inflation pressure resulted in higher slip due to reduced tire–soil contact area across all drive systems; however, 4WD remained less sensitive to inflation pressure, with slip at 230 kPa still lower than that of RWD and FWD at 170 kPa. Ballasting effectively reduced slip, with the 120 kg ballast providing the greatest improvement for all configurations. Model validation showed that the Hysteretic Spring Contact Model (HSCM) exhibited the strongest linear relationship with the experimental measurements among the investigated contact models, with the highest correlation coefficients across the evaluated operating conditions. These results indicate a stronger statistical relationship between the HSCM responses and the experimental observations compared with the HMCM and HMCM–JKR models. However, the regression and ANOVA results are interpreted as measures of relative model performance rather than as evidence of exact numerical agreement between DEM predictions and experimental measurements. Overall, the DEM framework provides a useful numerical approach for investigating tire–soil interaction under the operating conditions considered in this study.

Scientific Reports
University of Life Sciences in Lublin (PL), University of Mohaghegh Ardabili (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.