Remote sensing and deep learning for standing dead-tree detection and mapping: a review of advances, challenges, and future directions

Standing dead trees are visible indicators of tree mortality and an important transitional component linking forest disturbance to future lying deadwood, habitat availability, and carbon storage. As drought, insect outbreaks, pathogens, and climate extremes intensify tree mortality worldwide, scalable methods are needed to detect and map standing dead trees consistently across forest landscapes. Recent advances in high-resolution remote sensing and computer-vision-based deep learning, including object detection, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, and transformer-based models, have increased the automation and spatial detail of standing dead-tree detection and mapping. This critical narrative review synthesizes 75 studies published or publicly released between 2019 and July 2026 that apply deep learning to remotely sensed data for this purpose. The synthesis shows that high-resolution RGB and extended optical imagery dominate the evidence base. Satellite applications generally support broader observations at coarser target scales, including temporal, fractional, and upscaling analyses. Field-supported validation remains limited, with most studies relying primarily on image-based reference data. Object detection is the most frequently used primary model category, while FCN/U-Net models remain prominent for pixel-level semantic segmentation. Multi-sensor integration can improve robustness where spectral and structural information are complementary, but transferability across sites, biomes, sensors, and acquisition conditions remains weakly demonstrated. Operational deployment is further constrained by limited repeat coverage of very-high-resolution acquisitions, canopy occlusion, class imbalance, inconsistent target definitions and annotation protocols, and uncertain model generalization. Progress toward scalable and reliable monitoring will require shared and transparently documented benchmark datasets, harmonized target definitions and evaluation protocols, transferable learning strategies, and independent cross-site, cross-biome, and cross-sensor validation. By linking ecological monitoring needs with methodological advances, this review identifies priorities for more comparable, transferable, and operationally relevant standing dead-tree mapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Published
2026-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.09.050
Primary Topic
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote sensing and deep learning for standing dead-tree detection and mapping: a review of advances, challenges, and future directions

Clemens Mosig, Teja Kattenborn, Eija Honkavaara, Eetu Puttonen et al.
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
article

Remote sensing and deep learning for standing dead-tree detection and mapping: a review of advances, challenges, and future directions

Clemens Mosig, Teja Kattenborn, Eija Honkavaara, Eetu Puttonen, Anton Kuzmin, Yan Pei Cheng, Verena C. Griess, Mikko Vastaranta, Samuli Junttila, Langning Huo, Mete Ahishali, Anwarul Islam Chowdhury, Md. Jamal Uddin, Mirela Beloiu
article en

Abstract

Standing dead trees are visible indicators of tree mortality and an important transitional component linking forest disturbance to future lying deadwood, habitat availability, and carbon storage. As drought, insect outbreaks, pathogens, and climate extremes intensify tree mortality worldwide, scalable methods are needed to detect and map standing dead trees consistently across forest landscapes. Recent advances in high-resolution remote sensing and computer-vision-based deep learning, including object detection, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, and transformer-based models, have increased the automation and spatial detail of standing dead-tree detection and mapping. This critical narrative review synthesizes 75 studies published or publicly released between 2019 and July 2026 that apply deep learning to remotely sensed data for this purpose. The synthesis shows that high-resolution RGB and extended optical imagery dominate the evidence base. Satellite applications generally support broader observations at coarser target scales, including temporal, fractional, and upscaling analyses. Field-supported validation remains limited, with most studies relying primarily on image-based reference data. Object detection is the most frequently used primary model category, while FCN/U-Net models remain prominent for pixel-level semantic segmentation. Multi-sensor integration can improve robustness where spectral and structural information are complementary, but transferability across sites, biomes, sensors, and acquisition conditions remains weakly demonstrated. Operational deployment is further constrained by limited repeat coverage of very-high-resolution acquisitions, canopy occlusion, class imbalance, inconsistent target definitions and annotation protocols, and uncertain model generalization. Progress toward scalable and reliable monitoring will require shared and transparently documented benchmark datasets, harmonized target definitions and evaluation protocols, transferable learning strategies, and independent cross-site, cross-biome, and cross-sensor validation. By linking ecological monitoring needs with methodological advances, this review identifies priorities for more comparable, transferable, and operationally relevant standing dead-tree mapping.

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingVol. 243
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Freiburg (DE), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Rangamati Science and Technology University (BD), Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FI), ETH Zurich (CH), Maanmittauslaitos, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems (CH), Leipzig University (DE), Aalto University (FI)
European Research Council
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.