Nordic world class? Region branding and self-benchmarking

The Nordic Council of Ministers officially strives for a “green”, “competitive” and “socially sustainable” region under what it calls “Our Vision 2030”. To render the aggregate performance of its member states measurable, the Council deploys a total of forty-five indicators for “traffic-light visualizations” of achievements and trends benchmarked against other countries. Connecting scholarship on global benchmarking and place branding, this article examines the production of an idealized world-class region through self-benchmarking, which contrasts with the more common phenomenon of individual states’ performance being assessed by others. I interrogate the assumptions behind the Council’s aspirations by analyzing selected official documents. In line with the special issue theme, the study shows how self-benchmarking transcends the roles of the governors/benchmarkers and governed/benchmarked. Specifically, “Our Vision 2030” subscribes to a mainstream inclusive green growth position, which does little to distinguish the Nordic “brand” from those of other regions but instead rehearses a well-known narrative with a regional twist. The Council’s self-benchmarking apparatus thus risks ignoring evidence of negative ecological impacts and inequitable social outcomes of growth-friendly policies, as well as of the insufficient scope and pace of absolute decoupling of growth from ecological parameters to date.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2026.2625832
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nordic world class? Region branding and self-benchmarking

Matthias Kranke
Policy Studies
Regional Development and Policy
article

Nordic world class? Region branding and self-benchmarking

Matthias Kranke
article en

Abstract

The Nordic Council of Ministers officially strives for a “green”, “competitive” and “socially sustainable” region under what it calls “Our Vision 2030”. To render the aggregate performance of its member states measurable, the Council deploys a total of forty-five indicators for “traffic-light visualizations” of achievements and trends benchmarked against other countries. Connecting scholarship on global benchmarking and place branding, this article examines the production of an idealized world-class region through self-benchmarking, which contrasts with the more common phenomenon of individual states’ performance being assessed by others. I interrogate the assumptions behind the Council’s aspirations by analyzing selected official documents. In line with the special issue theme, the study shows how self-benchmarking transcends the roles of the governors/benchmarkers and governed/benchmarked. Specifically, “Our Vision 2030” subscribes to a mainstream inclusive green growth position, which does little to distinguish the Nordic “brand” from those of other regions but instead rehearses a well-known narrative with a regional twist. The Council’s self-benchmarking apparatus thus risks ignoring evidence of negative ecological impacts and inequitable social outcomes of growth-friendly policies, as well as of the insufficient scope and pace of absolute decoupling of growth from ecological parameters to date.

Policy Studies
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Regional Development and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.