CFD Study of the Effects of Groove Geometries on Heat Transfer for Internally Grooved Tubes

The CFD study investigated three different groove geometries: circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves, and these results were compared to a smooth tube. The results obtained from this CFD study were compared with experimental work completed for Reynolds numbers of 10,000, 22,000, 34,000, and 38,000. A CFD analysis for Reynolds numbers between 10,000 and 50,000 were performed to further investigate the effects of heat transfer on these geometries. This CFD work validated the experimental results and analyzed three additional Reynolds numbers of 42,000, 46,000, and 50,000 to further evaluate the turbulence effect on heat transfer. For increasing Reynolds numbers in the turbulence region, the Nusselt number significantly increased. The Nusselt number for the grooved geometries was significantly greater than that of the smooth tube. The augmented grooves resulted in the greatest enhancement of heat transfer for the circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves at a Reynolds number of 34,000 and were 63%, 31%, and 58%, respectively. These results are consistent with the experimentally obtained results for the circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves of 63%, 47%, and 58%, when compared to the smooth tube. It was observed that overall thermal enhancement was greatest for the augmented grooves in the Reynolds number range between 10,000 and 20,000. The friction factor for each grooved tube increased with higher Reynolds numbers, while the smooth tube showed a reduction in friction factor for the range 10,000 < Re < 38,000. All three grooves had greater axial pressure drop than the compared smooth tube. The rectangular groove exhibited the greatest axial pressure drop, while the circular and trapezoidal grooves were similar in their results. The mean heat enhancement factors for the circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves were determined to be 1.40, 1.12, and 1.25, respectively. Therefore, all three grooved geometries proved to be thermodynamically advantageous when compared to the smooth tube.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluids
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11100248
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CFD Study of the Effects of Groove Geometries on Heat Transfer for Internally Grooved Tubes

Samir Farid Moujaes, Richard Saroukhanoff
Fluids
Heat Transfer Mechanisms
article

CFD Study of the Effects of Groove Geometries on Heat Transfer for Internally Grooved Tubes

Samir Farid Moujaes, Richard Saroukhanoff
article en

Abstract

The CFD study investigated three different groove geometries: circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves, and these results were compared to a smooth tube. The results obtained from this CFD study were compared with experimental work completed for Reynolds numbers of 10,000, 22,000, 34,000, and 38,000. A CFD analysis for Reynolds numbers between 10,000 and 50,000 were performed to further investigate the effects of heat transfer on these geometries. This CFD work validated the experimental results and analyzed three additional Reynolds numbers of 42,000, 46,000, and 50,000 to further evaluate the turbulence effect on heat transfer. For increasing Reynolds numbers in the turbulence region, the Nusselt number significantly increased. The Nusselt number for the grooved geometries was significantly greater than that of the smooth tube. The augmented grooves resulted in the greatest enhancement of heat transfer for the circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves at a Reynolds number of 34,000 and were 63%, 31%, and 58%, respectively. These results are consistent with the experimentally obtained results for the circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves of 63%, 47%, and 58%, when compared to the smooth tube. It was observed that overall thermal enhancement was greatest for the augmented grooves in the Reynolds number range between 10,000 and 20,000. The friction factor for each grooved tube increased with higher Reynolds numbers, while the smooth tube showed a reduction in friction factor for the range 10,000 < Re < 38,000. All three grooves had greater axial pressure drop than the compared smooth tube. The rectangular groove exhibited the greatest axial pressure drop, while the circular and trapezoidal grooves were similar in their results. The mean heat enhancement factors for the circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal grooves were determined to be 1.40, 1.12, and 1.25, respectively. Therefore, all three grooved geometries proved to be thermodynamically advantageous when compared to the smooth tube.

FluidsVol. 11(10)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Heat Transfer Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CFD Study of the Effects of Groove Geometries on Heat Transfer for Internally Grooved Tubes — Samir Farid Moujaes, Richard Saroukhanoff · Fluids (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS