Environmental and Human Health Impact of Pediatric Appendicitis Management

Background: Surgical care is resource intensive, but the environmental consequences of treatment strategies for common pediatric surgical conditions are poorly characterized. We compared environmental emissions and environmentally mediated human health impacts of operative and nonoperative management of pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis. Study Design: A process-based life cycle assessment compared laparoscopic appendectomy with nonoperative management using antibiotic therapy. Environmental impacts were modeled using Ecoinvent databases within CarbonGraph EcoScan and quantified with the ReCiPe 2016 method. The functional unit was 1 completed episode of care, including index treatment and downstream events over 1 year. Population-level impacts were modeled across varying rates of nonoperative management uptake. Results: Appendectomy generated 15.20 kg CO₂e and 5.82 × 10⁻⁵ DALYs per episode, compared with 5.98 kg CO₂e and 2.14 × 10⁻⁵ DALYs for nonoperative management including failures. Increasing nonoperative management from 20% to 50% reduced climate change impact by 20.7% and human health damage by 21.7%, corresponding to approximately 66 metric tons of CO₂e annually. Conclusions: For pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis, nonoperative management was associated with lower modeled greenhouse gas emissions and environmentally mediated human health damage than laparoscopic appendectomy. When clinically appropriate, greater use of nonoperative management could reduce the environmental and human health burden of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000002241
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental and Human Health Impact of Pediatric Appendicitis Management

Nathalia Silva de Souza Lima Cano, Ami N. Shah, Gwyneth A. Sullivan, Patricia Cintora et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Environmental and Human Health Impact of Pediatric Appendicitis Management

Nathalia Silva de Souza Lima Cano, Ami N. Shah, Gwyneth A. Sullivan, Patricia Cintora, Brian C. Gulack
article en

Abstract

Background: Surgical care is resource intensive, but the environmental consequences of treatment strategies for common pediatric surgical conditions are poorly characterized. We compared environmental emissions and environmentally mediated human health impacts of operative and nonoperative management of pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis. Study Design: A process-based life cycle assessment compared laparoscopic appendectomy with nonoperative management using antibiotic therapy. Environmental impacts were modeled using Ecoinvent databases within CarbonGraph EcoScan and quantified with the ReCiPe 2016 method. The functional unit was 1 completed episode of care, including index treatment and downstream events over 1 year. Population-level impacts were modeled across varying rates of nonoperative management uptake. Results: Appendectomy generated 15.20 kg CO₂e and 5.82 × 10⁻⁵ DALYs per episode, compared with 5.98 kg CO₂e and 2.14 × 10⁻⁵ DALYs for nonoperative management including failures. Increasing nonoperative management from 20% to 50% reduced climate change impact by 20.7% and human health damage by 21.7%, corresponding to approximately 66 metric tons of CO₂e annually. Conclusions: For pediatric uncomplicated appendicitis, nonoperative management was associated with lower modeled greenhouse gas emissions and environmentally mediated human health damage than laparoscopic appendectomy. When clinically appropriate, greater use of nonoperative management could reduce the environmental and human health burden of care.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.