Chlorhexidine Versus Iodine-Based Skin Preparation Was Not Associated with a Significant Difference in 90-Day Infection Risk After Instrumented Degenerative Cervical or Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Background/Objectives: Chlorhexidine and iodine-based preparations are both widely used, and the existing literature suggests a possible advantage of chlorhexidine in clean elective surgery. Whether this extends to instrumented degenerative spine surgery is unknown. We asked whether chlorhexidine-based skin preparation reduces 90-day postoperative infection compared with iodine-based preparation after instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective TriNetX cohort study was performed among adults undergoing instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery. Patients were stratified by anatomic region and by preoperative preparation exposure: chlorhexidine-based versus iodine-based. Moreover, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed within each anatomic stratum on demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), diabetes, smoking, obesity and BMI, immunosuppression, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status, and index procedure codes. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative infection. Secondary outcomes were superficial and deep surgical site infection, MRSA infection, incision and drainage, debridement, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. Results: After matching, the cervical cohort included 3528 patients per group and the lumbar cohort 4164 per group. Postoperative infection did not differ in the cervical cohort (1.76% vs. 1.59%; risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.58; p = 0.578) or the lumbar cohort (3.17% vs. 3.29%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.22; p = 0.757). Superficial and deep infection, MRSA infection, debridement, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia did not differ significantly in either cohort. Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in 90-day postoperative infection was found between chlorhexidine-based and iodine-based skin preparation after instrumented degenerative cervical or lumbar spine surgery.
Authors
- Bryce A. Basques (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-8701)
- Bassel Georges Diebo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-2263)
- Alan H. Daniels (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-4139)
- Timothy A. Reiad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0408-5259)
- Firas Batrash
- Artin Allahverdian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9978-6694)
- Siddharth Jasti
- Tasif Mahmoud
- James A. Belanger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4436-6422)
- Ahmed Iqbal
- Fahad Jamal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2910-756X)
Institutions
- Brown University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2026-10-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197714
- Primary Topic
- Surgical site infection prevention
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00