Establishment and Application of a Quantitative Lipemia Index as a Novel Indicator for Assessing Lipemic Interference in Clinical Chemistry

ABSTRACT Background Lipemia is a common pre‐analytical interference in clinical chemistry. Triglyceride (TG) concentration is commonly used as a surrogate indicator for lipemic interference, but its predictive reliability is limited by heterogeneity in lipoprotein particle composition. This study aimed to establish and validate a quantitative Lipemia index (LI) assay for direct measurement of serum turbidity, compare its predictive value with TG, and evaluate its clinical applicability through reference interval estimation and correlation with interference deviations in native patient samples. Methods The LI assay was developed on a Beckman Coulter AU5800 analyzer by measuring Δ A ( A 660 – A 800 nm ). Performance was validated per CLSI guidelines: precision (EP05‐A3), detection capability (EP17‐A2), linearity (EP06‐ED2), method comparison (Passing‐Bablok regression, Bland–Altman analysis), reference interval (EP28‐A3c), and dilution recovery (EP07‐A2). LI's predictive value for lipemic interference was compared to TG using deviations in total protein assays (single‐ vs. double‐reagent methods). Results The LI assay demonstrated precision with CV ≤ 2.23% and linearity (0.05–30.87 mmol/L TG‐equivalent). It correlated strongly with the reference TG method ( ρ = 0.998, p < 0.0001). In predicting assay interference, LI showed a closer correlation with total protein deviations than did TG ( r s = 0.822 vs. 0.770). A reference interval of 0.093–0.240 was established for healthy adults. Dilution recovery (90%–110%) confirmed accuracy. Conclusions The quantitative LI assay provides a standardized, clinically validated measure of lipemic interference aligning more directly with the optical nature of clinical chemistry testing than TG measurement. These findings support its analytical validity, utility as a predictor of turbidity interference, and clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70378
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishment and Application of a Quantitative Lipemia Index as a Novel Indicator for Assessing Lipemic Interference in Clinical Chemistry

Shuhua Bao, J.T. Wei, Pengcheng Tong, Zhe Shen et al.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Establishment and Application of a Quantitative Lipemia Index as a Novel Indicator for Assessing Lipemic Interference in Clinical Chemistry

Shuhua Bao, J.T. Wei, Pengcheng Tong, Zhe Shen, Peng Li, Haifeng Xie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Lipemia is a common pre‐analytical interference in clinical chemistry. Triglyceride (TG) concentration is commonly used as a surrogate indicator for lipemic interference, but its predictive reliability is limited by heterogeneity in lipoprotein particle composition. This study aimed to establish and validate a quantitative Lipemia index (LI) assay for direct measurement of serum turbidity, compare its predictive value with TG, and evaluate its clinical applicability through reference interval estimation and correlation with interference deviations in native patient samples. Methods The LI assay was developed on a Beckman Coulter AU5800 analyzer by measuring Δ A ( A 660 – A 800 nm ). Performance was validated per CLSI guidelines: precision (EP05‐A3), detection capability (EP17‐A2), linearity (EP06‐ED2), method comparison (Passing‐Bablok regression, Bland–Altman analysis), reference interval (EP28‐A3c), and dilution recovery (EP07‐A2). LI's predictive value for lipemic interference was compared to TG using deviations in total protein assays (single‐ vs. double‐reagent methods). Results The LI assay demonstrated precision with CV ≤ 2.23% and linearity (0.05–30.87 mmol/L TG‐equivalent). It correlated strongly with the reference TG method ( ρ = 0.998, p < 0.0001). In predicting assay interference, LI showed a closer correlation with total protein deviations than did TG ( r s = 0.822 vs. 0.770). A reference interval of 0.093–0.240 was established for healthy adults. Dilution recovery (90%–110%) confirmed accuracy. Conclusions The quantitative LI assay provides a standardized, clinically validated measure of lipemic interference aligning more directly with the optical nature of clinical chemistry testing than TG measurement. These findings support its analytical validity, utility as a predictor of turbidity interference, and clinical applicability.

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Dalian Municipal Central Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Tonghua Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.