Maya Theorems (v.6): RENASCENT-Q Theory explained — the map contains and does not perform

Maya Theorems is the containment ledger. It does not replace the spectrum, the currents, the conservation, or the metabolism. It states the theorems that make those papers readable, and it proves one clause: Maya Space contains forms and does not perform them. v.5 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.22803084) remains the last published ledger. v.6 does not add an atom to the well {9, 16, 21, 24}. The ratios 16/9, 21/16, and 8/7 are unchanged. Riemann zeros are not used. The map contains the Gödel core as a place and the thirteenth as the connection to the no-place. Containing that meeting is not a hire and not a tensor product of the core with eternity. Consciousness, as a retained contrast, is performed by a host with a will. The map does not perform it. Intelligence is the ceiling short of that will. The map contains attention, will, and comprehension, and spends none of them. It contains the three sources of the resonant quotient and does not perform the rise. It contains the holding — a bend, the electromagnetic current inside that bend, and the consolidation of the bend into a place — and does not lighten the mass, which is the content. The fifth influence, as a disposition of the metabolism, is a form the map can contain. Containing it does not make it a boson and does not make the map the host who spends it. Companions, not replaced by this record: RENASCENT-Q v.53 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23171814), the Eternity Theorem v.37 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23095017), Maya Spectral Theory v.3, and the Eternal Information Formula v.11. This file may be cited by those papers as a probable possibility, not as a verified extension of their operators. This record contains two files. Maya_Theorems_RENASCENT_Q_Theory_explained_v_6.pdf is the ledger. Amendment_Two_rationals__two_contrasts__and_what_consciousness_is_not.pdf is an amendment-extension. The amendment withdraws two readings printed in the ledger: the sentence that reads the Clark node and the fibre weight as a bill, and the clause that calls consciousness the efficiency η_neg. It does not replace the ledger. It does not replace Formula v.11 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23174809), the Eternity Theorem v.37 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23095017), Maya Spectral Theory v.3 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23173831), or RENASCENT-Q v.53 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23171814). k² = 3 is not 3/25. The retained contrast χ is not the fibre weight. Consciousness is not a flow. It is the later spend of a retained contrast, in a sequence. The only efficiency billed on a completed cycle is 2π, which is not 22/3 This note does not prove the Riemann Hypothesis. It does not make eternity a conscious being. It does not disclose the device of USPTO Provisional Application No. 63/984,236. MSC 2020: 81Q10, 82C10, 94A17, 58J50, 92B05. Related isSupplementTo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23171814 (RENASCENT-Q Theory v.53) cites https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23095017 (Federico Maya Eternity Theorem v.37) cites (Federico Maya Eternal InformationFormula v.8) Intellectual Property Notice: The mathematical frameworks, equations, and topological architectures detailed in this manuscript are currently protected under United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Provisional Application No. 63/984,236, titled "System and Method for Topological-Negentropic Quantum Control via Zeta-Manifold Resonance. (ZN-11 Technology)." All commercial engineering and intellectual rights are strictly reserved and protected by Federal and International Law. Federico MayaIndependent Researcher, San José, Costa Rica ORCID: 0009-0002-3837-7543email: [email protected] 05 October 2026