Impact of asymmetrical load magnitude and location on postural sway metrics in healthy young adults

Abstract Background Asymmetrical load carriage is a common component of daily activities. Carrying a backpack, handbag, or groceries on one side for example alters the center of mass of the system and may challenge postural stability. Such asymmetrical demands on postural control may be a meaningful stressor to evaluate and address during clinical management. Objective To determine the influence of lateral asymmetrical load on postural metrics, whether greater loads produce larger responses, and whether location of the load affects the response. Methods Twenty-four healthy young adults (21.13 ± 1.48 years) participated in this repeated-measures study during November 2025. Participants completed five standing conditions including no load, handheld as well as shoulder loads at 15% and 20% body mass using the same backpack. Postural metrics were assessed using a force plate. Outcome measures included average mediolateral center of pressure location (COP X), average anteroposterior center of pressure location (COP Y), 95% ellipse area of postural sway, and total path length. Repeated measures analyses of variance with planned contrasts were performed to evaluate differences among conditions. Results Loaded conditions demonstrated greater mediolateral shift in COP X (toward the side of load), greater 95% ellipse sway area, and greater path length compared with the no load condition. Greater magnitude loading (e.g. 20% vs. 15%) amplified both COP X and path length. Hand loading increased mediolateral shift in COP X more than shoulder loading whereas shoulder loading increased 95% sway area more than the hand. Load location did not affect path length. Lateral loading had no statistically significant effect on COP Y. Conclusions Both load magnitude and load location influence postural control metrics during asymmetrical load carriage. Clinicians may use this information to guide patients toward safer load carrying strategies when attempting to reduce postural instability and musculoskeletal strain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-026-00682-8
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of asymmetrical load magnitude and location on postural sway metrics in healthy young adults

William P. Berg, Dean L. Smith, MARK S. WALSH, Abdul Rafi
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Impact of asymmetrical load magnitude and location on postural sway metrics in healthy young adults

William P. Berg, Dean L. Smith, MARK S. WALSH, Abdul Rafi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Asymmetrical load carriage is a common component of daily activities. Carrying a backpack, handbag, or groceries on one side for example alters the center of mass of the system and may challenge postural stability. Such asymmetrical demands on postural control may be a meaningful stressor to evaluate and address during clinical management. Objective To determine the influence of lateral asymmetrical load on postural metrics, whether greater loads produce larger responses, and whether location of the load affects the response. Methods Twenty-four healthy young adults (21.13 ± 1.48 years) participated in this repeated-measures study during November 2025. Participants completed five standing conditions including no load, handheld as well as shoulder loads at 15% and 20% body mass using the same backpack. Postural metrics were assessed using a force plate. Outcome measures included average mediolateral center of pressure location (COP X), average anteroposterior center of pressure location (COP Y), 95% ellipse area of postural sway, and total path length. Repeated measures analyses of variance with planned contrasts were performed to evaluate differences among conditions. Results Loaded conditions demonstrated greater mediolateral shift in COP X (toward the side of load), greater 95% ellipse sway area, and greater path length compared with the no load condition. Greater magnitude loading (e.g. 20% vs. 15%) amplified both COP X and path length. Hand loading increased mediolateral shift in COP X more than shoulder loading whereas shoulder loading increased 95% sway area more than the hand. Load location did not affect path length. Lateral loading had no statistically significant effect on COP Y. Conclusions Both load magnitude and load location influence postural control metrics during asymmetrical load carriage. Clinicians may use this information to guide patients toward safer load carrying strategies when attempting to reduce postural instability and musculoskeletal strain.

Chiropractic & Manual TherapiesVol. 34(1)
Miami University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of asymmetrical load magnitude and location on postural sway metrics in healthy young adults — William P. Berg, Dean L. Smith, et al. · Chiropractic & Manual Therapies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS