Externalisation and acculturation: the (re-)emergence of intervention-in-disguise?

Foreign intervention practices have unintended consequences for both the intervener and the intervened-in countries. The result has been a disdain and hesitancy by global powers within the liberal international order, notably the United States and, to a comparative extent, China and Russia as well as international organisations, to sanction unilateral and multilateral interventions. Despite this, these global powers continue to pursue their interests and foreign policy objectives, particularly in the Global South. Faced with this quandary, this paper uses the United States as its primary analytical lens while situating it within existing great power competition to demonstrate how global powers resort to externalisation of their practices, policies, norms and principles, and to a systematic acculturation of the Global South to create conditions that reduce the consequences of intervention but still achieve the same objectives as unilateral and multilateral intervention. The paper argues that understanding contemporary intervention practices by global powers requires reframing the concept of intervention to incorporate practices that disguise intervention, specifically by exploring how externalisation and acculturation re-emerge as ‘intervention-in-disguise’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2026.2718830
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Externalisation and acculturation: the (re-)emergence of intervention-in-disguise?

Padmore Adusei Amoah, Obert Hodzi
Third World Quarterly
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Externalisation and acculturation: the (re-)emergence of intervention-in-disguise?

Padmore Adusei Amoah, Obert Hodzi
article en

Abstract

Foreign intervention practices have unintended consequences for both the intervener and the intervened-in countries. The result has been a disdain and hesitancy by global powers within the liberal international order, notably the United States and, to a comparative extent, China and Russia as well as international organisations, to sanction unilateral and multilateral interventions. Despite this, these global powers continue to pursue their interests and foreign policy objectives, particularly in the Global South. Faced with this quandary, this paper uses the United States as its primary analytical lens while situating it within existing great power competition to demonstrate how global powers resort to externalisation of their practices, policies, norms and principles, and to a systematic acculturation of the Global South to create conditions that reduce the consequences of intervention but still achieve the same objectives as unilateral and multilateral intervention. The paper argues that understanding contemporary intervention practices by global powers requires reframing the concept of intervention to incorporate practices that disguise intervention, specifically by exploring how externalisation and acculturation re-emerge as ‘intervention-in-disguise’.

Third World Quarterly
University of Liverpool (GB), Lingnan University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Externalisation and acculturation: the (re-)emergence of intervention-in-disguise? — Padmore Adusei Amoah, Obert Hodzi · Third World Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS