Mobile Applications and Wearable Digital Tools for Suicide Prevention

Abstract: Background: Suicide is a major public health concern and a leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Digital interventions (DIs) are technology-based tools designed to support healthcare systems. Aims: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of mobile applications and wearable digital tools on suicidal ideation. Method: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from January 2010 to April 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies include quantitative designs and assess mobile or wearable technologies targeting suicide prevention, with suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or suicide deaths as outcomes. Results: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria ( N = 16,731), including adolescents, adults, and high-risk populations. DIs included mobile apps, wearable monitoring tools, web platforms, and integrated systems. Seven of nine studies reported reductions in suicidal ideation; however, no included studies assessed suicide attempts or suicide deaths. Several studies found modest short-term improvements in depression and anxiety. Apps with passive monitoring or structured therapeutic modules showed higher engagement, although adherence declined over time. Adolescents and high-risk groups showed high acceptability. Limitations: First, the studies vary considerably in design, intervention type, and target population, making direct comparisons difficult. Second, many studies had small samples and short follow-ups, limiting assessment of long-term effects. Third, all studies focused on suicidal ideation, with none examining attempts or mortality, reducing clinical relevance. Finally, suicide is complex, influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, yet most DIs target ideation alone without a multidisciplinary approach. Conclusion: DI appears acceptable and potentially beneficial for suicide prevention, particularly with respect to suicidal ideation, while no conclusions can be drawn regarding suicide attempts or mortality. Although engagement and acceptability are high, further research should evaluate long-term effectiveness and systematically include suicide attempts and deaths as outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crisis
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001076
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobile Applications and Wearable Digital Tools for Suicide Prevention

Miquel Roca, Margalida Gili, Valentina Baldini, Giorgia Varallo
Crisis
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Mobile Applications and Wearable Digital Tools for Suicide Prevention

Miquel Roca, Margalida Gili, Valentina Baldini, Giorgia Varallo
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Suicide is a major public health concern and a leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Digital interventions (DIs) are technology-based tools designed to support healthcare systems. Aims: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of mobile applications and wearable digital tools on suicidal ideation. Method: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from January 2010 to April 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies include quantitative designs and assess mobile or wearable technologies targeting suicide prevention, with suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or suicide deaths as outcomes. Results: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria ( N = 16,731), including adolescents, adults, and high-risk populations. DIs included mobile apps, wearable monitoring tools, web platforms, and integrated systems. Seven of nine studies reported reductions in suicidal ideation; however, no included studies assessed suicide attempts or suicide deaths. Several studies found modest short-term improvements in depression and anxiety. Apps with passive monitoring or structured therapeutic modules showed higher engagement, although adherence declined over time. Adolescents and high-risk groups showed high acceptability. Limitations: First, the studies vary considerably in design, intervention type, and target population, making direct comparisons difficult. Second, many studies had small samples and short follow-ups, limiting assessment of long-term effects. Third, all studies focused on suicidal ideation, with none examining attempts or mortality, reducing clinical relevance. Finally, suicide is complex, influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, yet most DIs target ideation alone without a multidisciplinary approach. Conclusion: DI appears acceptable and potentially beneficial for suicide prevention, particularly with respect to suicidal ideation, while no conclusions can be drawn regarding suicide attempts or mortality. Although engagement and acceptability are high, further research should evaluate long-term effectiveness and systematically include suicide attempts and deaths as outcomes.

Crisis
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (ES), Research Institute of Health Sciences (ES), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.