Whose responsibility? Deconstructing global responsible AI from the African lens: a review

Abstract This paper uses the theory of decoloniality to critically examine how African scholars have interrogated the dominant, global narratives surrounding responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Through a multivocal literature review, the paper reveals a range of critical perspectives that expose systemic exclusions and imbalances in the current responsible AI discourse. Key themes identified include the marginalisation of African epistemologies, values, and principles; the absence of representative African datasets, lack of locally grounded regulatory frameworks; the limited inclusion and or availability of African expertise and funding; and the persistent power asymmetries and coloniality embedded in global responsible AI ethics and governance. The review highlights emerging efforts towards reconstructing responsible AI from an African contextual lens. Central to this constructive turn is the proposal of a decoloniality framework that puts emphasis on African knowledge systems, reclaims agency in AI development, and reimagines responsible AI in ways that are contextually grounded, pluriversal, and socially acceptable. This review not only contributes to critical AI scholarship but also charts pathways for more inclusive and equitable AI futures on the continent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01418-3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose responsibility? Deconstructing global responsible AI from the African lens: a review

Makuochi Samuel Nkwo, Damian Eke, Simisola Akintoye, Sarah Kiden et al.
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Whose responsibility? Deconstructing global responsible AI from the African lens: a review

Makuochi Samuel Nkwo, Damian Eke, Simisola Akintoye, Sarah Kiden, Ibifuro Robert Jaja, Muhammad Sadi Adamu, Michael kenneth Ugom
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper uses the theory of decoloniality to critically examine how African scholars have interrogated the dominant, global narratives surrounding responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Through a multivocal literature review, the paper reveals a range of critical perspectives that expose systemic exclusions and imbalances in the current responsible AI discourse. Key themes identified include the marginalisation of African epistemologies, values, and principles; the absence of representative African datasets, lack of locally grounded regulatory frameworks; the limited inclusion and or availability of African expertise and funding; and the persistent power asymmetries and coloniality embedded in global responsible AI ethics and governance. The review highlights emerging efforts towards reconstructing responsible AI from an African contextual lens. Central to this constructive turn is the proposal of a decoloniality framework that puts emphasis on African knowledge systems, reclaims agency in AI development, and reimagines responsible AI in ways that are contextually grounded, pluriversal, and socially acceptable. This review not only contributes to critical AI scholarship but also charts pathways for more inclusive and equitable AI futures on the continent.

AI and EthicsVol. 6(6)
University of Nigeria (NG), University of Nottingham (GB), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Northumbria University (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Greenwich (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Whose responsibility? Deconstructing global responsible AI from the African lens: a review — Makuochi Samuel Nkwo, Damian Eke, et al. · AI and Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS