A conceptual framework for understanding the accessibility of protected area benefits

Protected area (PA) management for biodiversity conservation involves controlling which resources are made accessible, and to whom. PA accessibility is not only central to the long-term effectiveness of PA management but also for the equitable distribution of PA benefits. Despite its importance, information about PA accessibility is fragmented. Conservation currently lacks a cohesive framework that explains (i) what is required for different individuals to derive PA benefits and (ii) how conservation institutions can create opportunities to access these benefits. To address this gap, we draw on ideas from healthcare to conceptualise and define access as the set of available opportunities to benefit from PAs. Our framework defines PA access as a process that involves first perceiving PAs as sources of benefits and then having opportunities to seek, reach, use and engage with services that ultimately generate an individual or collective benefit. We describe the elements of the framework drawing parallels with conservation literature and illustrate its application using a case study examining PA accessibility for two stakeholder groups. The framework proposes a way of explicitly integrating individuals’ socio-economic positionality into access analysis, revealing how access management decisions and other accessibility features create differential opportunities at each of these steps. Assessing PA management outcomes through the access framework makes implicit access barriers visible and identifies specific intervention points for improving equity in PA access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystems and People
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2026.2736662
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A conceptual framework for understanding the accessibility of protected area benefits

Graeme S. Cumming, Matthew Navarro, Valeria Y. Mendez Angarita, Abbie A. Rogers
Ecosystems and People
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

A conceptual framework for understanding the accessibility of protected area benefits

Graeme S. Cumming, Matthew Navarro, Valeria Y. Mendez Angarita, Abbie A. Rogers
article en

Abstract

Protected area (PA) management for biodiversity conservation involves controlling which resources are made accessible, and to whom. PA accessibility is not only central to the long-term effectiveness of PA management but also for the equitable distribution of PA benefits. Despite its importance, information about PA accessibility is fragmented. Conservation currently lacks a cohesive framework that explains (i) what is required for different individuals to derive PA benefits and (ii) how conservation institutions can create opportunities to access these benefits. To address this gap, we draw on ideas from healthcare to conceptualise and define access as the set of available opportunities to benefit from PAs. Our framework defines PA access as a process that involves first perceiving PAs as sources of benefits and then having opportunities to seek, reach, use and engage with services that ultimately generate an individual or collective benefit. We describe the elements of the framework drawing parallels with conservation literature and illustrate its application using a case study examining PA accessibility for two stakeholder groups. The framework proposes a way of explicitly integrating individuals’ socio-economic positionality into access analysis, revealing how access management decisions and other accessibility features create differential opportunities at each of these steps. Assessing PA management outcomes through the access framework makes implicit access barriers visible and identifies specific intervention points for improving equity in PA access.

Ecosystems and PeopleVol. 22(1)
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.