Social-ecological portfolio effects in ecosystem service provision, the case of commercial Pacific salmon fisheries in Canada

Human societies depend on stable ecosystem services, which are often stabilized by the ecological portfolio effect arising from biodiversity. Yet, whether this ecological stability propagates to the socio-economic dimensions of an ecosystem service is poorly understood. This study provides a social-ecological portfolio analysis of an ecosystem service by examining the provisioning service provided by commercial Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus ) fisheries in British Columbia, Canada. We used the Essential Ecosystem Service Variables (EESV) framework to analyze longitudinal monitoring data across multiple ecosystem service dimensions: ecological supply (abundance), use (catch), demand (price), instrumental value (landed value), and anthropogenic contribution (effort). We quantified portfolio strength and synchrony at two scales: a provincial multi-species portfolio (driven by species diversity) and regional species-level portfolio (driven by regional diversity). At the provincial scale, we found that species diversity provided a stabilizing portfolio effect across ecological and socio-economic dimensions. However, the underlying dynamics in species pair synchrony were not uniform. For example, we found high synchronicity in the Chinook–Coho pair for ecological supply , and Coho–Pink for instrumental value . This difference suggests that social and economic processes provide an additional, portfolio buffering effect. At the species-level, regional portfolios varied greatly: Pink was the most stable throughout social-ecological dimensions, whereas Chinook showed a weak, synchronous portfolio in ecological supply , highlighting potential vulnerability. Our findings suggest that, while biodiversity underpins overall social-ecological stability, specific ecological dynamics, such as the synchronicity of Chinook dynamics, may threaten ecosystem service stability. This approach highlights the importance of integrated social-ecological monitoring to identify and manage risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Ecosystems
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pesy.0000029
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social-ecological portfolio effects in ecosystem service provision, the case of commercial Pacific salmon fisheries in Canada

Marie‐Josée Fortin, Andrew Gonzalez, Flavio Affinito
PLOS Ecosystems
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Social-ecological portfolio effects in ecosystem service provision, the case of commercial Pacific salmon fisheries in Canada

Marie‐Josée Fortin, Andrew Gonzalez, Flavio Affinito
article en

Abstract

Human societies depend on stable ecosystem services, which are often stabilized by the ecological portfolio effect arising from biodiversity. Yet, whether this ecological stability propagates to the socio-economic dimensions of an ecosystem service is poorly understood. This study provides a social-ecological portfolio analysis of an ecosystem service by examining the provisioning service provided by commercial Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus ) fisheries in British Columbia, Canada. We used the Essential Ecosystem Service Variables (EESV) framework to analyze longitudinal monitoring data across multiple ecosystem service dimensions: ecological supply (abundance), use (catch), demand (price), instrumental value (landed value), and anthropogenic contribution (effort). We quantified portfolio strength and synchrony at two scales: a provincial multi-species portfolio (driven by species diversity) and regional species-level portfolio (driven by regional diversity). At the provincial scale, we found that species diversity provided a stabilizing portfolio effect across ecological and socio-economic dimensions. However, the underlying dynamics in species pair synchrony were not uniform. For example, we found high synchronicity in the Chinook–Coho pair for ecological supply , and Coho–Pink for instrumental value . This difference suggests that social and economic processes provide an additional, portfolio buffering effect. At the species-level, regional portfolios varied greatly: Pink was the most stable throughout social-ecological dimensions, whereas Chinook showed a weak, synchronous portfolio in ecological supply , highlighting potential vulnerability. Our findings suggest that, while biodiversity underpins overall social-ecological stability, specific ecological dynamics, such as the synchronicity of Chinook dynamics, may threaten ecosystem service stability. This approach highlights the importance of integrated social-ecological monitoring to identify and manage risk.

PLOS EcosystemsVol. 1(2)
University of Toronto (CA), Group on Earth Observations (CH), Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.