Neural substrates of knowledge integration: differential effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on angular gyrus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

Background Humans develop extensive knowledge systems throughout their lives, which are continuously updated in response to new information. One way in which prior knowledge is updated is through semantic integration, where related semantic facts are integrated to support derivation of new information. Methods This study investigates how anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) applied to the left angular gyrus (AG; Experiment 1) or to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC; Experiment 2) influences semantic integration and the derivation of novel information. In both studies, participants were first randomly assigned to a stimulation or sham group. Following the stimulation protocol, they were presented with a series of intermixed pairs of related facts and asked to rate their familiarity with each. Participants then completed a semantic integration test following a brief delay, answering questions about novel information that could be derived by integrating the related facts. Participants’ integration scores (primary outcome) and their correlations with general intelligence (IQ) (secondary outcome) were measured. Building on exploratory findings from Experiment 1, Experiment 2 was pre-registered to test the impact of stimulation on the correlation between IQ and integration. Results There was no overall mean difference in integration scores between stimulation groups and their sham stimulation counterparts (all p s > 0.10). Stimulation to the left AG resulted in significantly lower variance in integration scores compared to sham stimulation ( p < 0.05), reflecting fewer stimulation participants scoring very low on integration. Conversely, stimulation to the left vlPFC reduced the correlation between participants’ IQ and their integration scores ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Self-derivation of new knowledge is a complex, multifactorial process that was not uniquely enhanced by stimulation of the left AG or vlPFC. However, these regions appear to differentially modulate performance by reducing variability for lower-performing individuals (AG) or decoupling the dependence of performance on baseline cognitive capacity (vlPFC).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21761
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural substrates of knowledge integration: differential effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on angular gyrus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

Asaf Gilboa, Karen Joseph, Xuan Zhang, Michael Lochner
PeerJ
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Neural substrates of knowledge integration: differential effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on angular gyrus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex

Asaf Gilboa, Karen Joseph, Xuan Zhang, Michael Lochner
article en

Abstract

Background Humans develop extensive knowledge systems throughout their lives, which are continuously updated in response to new information. One way in which prior knowledge is updated is through semantic integration, where related semantic facts are integrated to support derivation of new information. Methods This study investigates how anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) applied to the left angular gyrus (AG; Experiment 1) or to the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC; Experiment 2) influences semantic integration and the derivation of novel information. In both studies, participants were first randomly assigned to a stimulation or sham group. Following the stimulation protocol, they were presented with a series of intermixed pairs of related facts and asked to rate their familiarity with each. Participants then completed a semantic integration test following a brief delay, answering questions about novel information that could be derived by integrating the related facts. Participants’ integration scores (primary outcome) and their correlations with general intelligence (IQ) (secondary outcome) were measured. Building on exploratory findings from Experiment 1, Experiment 2 was pre-registered to test the impact of stimulation on the correlation between IQ and integration. Results There was no overall mean difference in integration scores between stimulation groups and their sham stimulation counterparts (all p s > 0.10). Stimulation to the left AG resulted in significantly lower variance in integration scores compared to sham stimulation ( p < 0.05), reflecting fewer stimulation participants scoring very low on integration. Conversely, stimulation to the left vlPFC reduced the correlation between participants’ IQ and their integration scores ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Self-derivation of new knowledge is a complex, multifactorial process that was not uniquely enhanced by stimulation of the left AG or vlPFC. However, these regions appear to differentially modulate performance by reducing variability for lower-performing individuals (AG) or decoupling the dependence of performance on baseline cognitive capacity (vlPFC).

PeerJVol. 14
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital (CA), Baycrest Hospital (CA), Rotman Research Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.