Does Preseason Training Load Shape Body Composition? External Load, Internal Load, and Fatigue in Semi-Professional Football Players

Background: Monitoring athletes’ responses to training is essential for optimizing performance and player management in football. Although training load is considered an important component of physiological adaptations, its relationship with body composition changes during preseason remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to (i) examine changes in body composition, training load, and fatigue throughout the preseason and (ii) determine whether accumulated training load and fatigue were associated with body composition changes in semi-professional football players. Methods: Twenty semi-professional male football players from the same team were monitored during a six-week preseason that included 28 training sessions and seven friendly matches. Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis at the beginning (Testing Session 1, TS1), middle (Testing Session 2, TS2), and end (Testing Session 3, TS3) of the preseason. External load and heart rate (HR) were quantified using Global Positioning System (GPS) devices, while internal load was assessed through session rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and fatigue was assessed using wellness questionnaires. Results: Significant changes in body composition were observed across the preseason. Fat mass increased, whereas fat-free mass, lean mass, and skeletal muscle mass decreased by TS3 (all p < 0.01; large, standardized effect sizes). No significant associations were found between accumulated external load, internal load, HR exposure, fatigue indicators, and body composition changes after baseline adjustment and multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Significant alterations in body composition were observed over the preseason period. Given the observational design and absence of a non-training control group, the observed changes cannot be attributed solely to the preseason training stimulus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk11040410
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Preseason Training Load Shape Body Composition? External Load, Internal Load, and Fatigue in Semi-Professional Football Players

David Lobo-Triviño, Víctor Toro-Román, José Carlos Ponce-Bordón, Jorge Polo-Tejada
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Sports Performance and Training
article

Does Preseason Training Load Shape Body Composition? External Load, Internal Load, and Fatigue in Semi-Professional Football Players

David Lobo-Triviño, Víctor Toro-Román, José Carlos Ponce-Bordón, Jorge Polo-Tejada
article en

Abstract

Background: Monitoring athletes’ responses to training is essential for optimizing performance and player management in football. Although training load is considered an important component of physiological adaptations, its relationship with body composition changes during preseason remains unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to (i) examine changes in body composition, training load, and fatigue throughout the preseason and (ii) determine whether accumulated training load and fatigue were associated with body composition changes in semi-professional football players. Methods: Twenty semi-professional male football players from the same team were monitored during a six-week preseason that included 28 training sessions and seven friendly matches. Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis at the beginning (Testing Session 1, TS1), middle (Testing Session 2, TS2), and end (Testing Session 3, TS3) of the preseason. External load and heart rate (HR) were quantified using Global Positioning System (GPS) devices, while internal load was assessed through session rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and fatigue was assessed using wellness questionnaires. Results: Significant changes in body composition were observed across the preseason. Fat mass increased, whereas fat-free mass, lean mass, and skeletal muscle mass decreased by TS3 (all p < 0.01; large, standardized effect sizes). No significant associations were found between accumulated external load, internal load, HR exposure, fatigue indicators, and body composition changes after baseline adjustment and multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Significant alterations in body composition were observed over the preseason period. Given the observational design and absence of a non-training control group, the observed changes cannot be attributed solely to the preseason training stimulus.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 11(4)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), TecnoCampus (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.