Rethinking Cognitive Bias in Human–AI Cognitive Systems: A Structured Conceptual Mapping Review

Research in cognitive psychology has long shown that human judgment and decision making are systematically influenced by cognitive biases, particularly under conditions of uncertainty. As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly embedded in socially relevant decision making contexts—such as healthcare, education, communication, and governance—these cognitive dynamics do not disappear. Instead, they may be reproduced, amplified, or transformed through human–AI interaction. Despite the rapid growth of research on cognitive biases in AI-related contexts, existing reviews remain fragmented and heterogeneous, often focusing on single biases or specific application domains. This article reports a structured conceptual mapping review of review-level publications examining how cognitive biases are conceptualized, categorized, and addressed in human–AI interaction. A bounded search of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed identified ten eligible review publications published between 2020 and 2025. Using a three-level framework, the mapping distinguishes data-level, algorithmic-level, and human-interaction-level processes. Within the retrieved corpus, the analysis reveals heterogeneous terminology, a predominance of healthcare applications and interaction-level analyses, and limited review-level synthesis of empirical evaluations of mitigation strategies. Drawing on distributed cognition and joint cognitive systems, we propose coupled human–AI cognition as a theoretical lens rather than as an empirically established conclusion. The study provides a structured conceptual map, identifies terminological and methodological gaps, and develops propositions for future empirical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16101829
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Cognitive Bias in Human–AI Cognitive Systems: A Structured Conceptual Mapping Review

Alessandra Cecilia Jacomuzzi, Brigitta Pia Alioto, Sara Magni
Behavioral Sciences
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Rethinking Cognitive Bias in Human–AI Cognitive Systems: A Structured Conceptual Mapping Review

Alessandra Cecilia Jacomuzzi, Brigitta Pia Alioto, Sara Magni
article en

Abstract

Research in cognitive psychology has long shown that human judgment and decision making are systematically influenced by cognitive biases, particularly under conditions of uncertainty. As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly embedded in socially relevant decision making contexts—such as healthcare, education, communication, and governance—these cognitive dynamics do not disappear. Instead, they may be reproduced, amplified, or transformed through human–AI interaction. Despite the rapid growth of research on cognitive biases in AI-related contexts, existing reviews remain fragmented and heterogeneous, often focusing on single biases or specific application domains. This article reports a structured conceptual mapping review of review-level publications examining how cognitive biases are conceptualized, categorized, and addressed in human–AI interaction. A bounded search of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed identified ten eligible review publications published between 2020 and 2025. Using a three-level framework, the mapping distinguishes data-level, algorithmic-level, and human-interaction-level processes. Within the retrieved corpus, the analysis reveals heterogeneous terminology, a predominance of healthcare applications and interaction-level analyses, and limited review-level synthesis of empirical evaluations of mitigation strategies. Drawing on distributed cognition and joint cognitive systems, we propose coupled human–AI cognition as a theoretical lens rather than as an empirically established conclusion. The study provides a structured conceptual map, identifies terminological and methodological gaps, and develops propositions for future empirical research.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(10)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking Cognitive Bias in Human–AI Cognitive Systems: A Structured Conceptual Mapping Review — Alessandra Cecilia Jacomuzzi, Brigitta Pia Alioto, et al. · Behavioral Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS