Algorithmic Literacy and Quotidian Curation Practices: Rethinking User Agency in the Social Media Regulation Era

ABSTRACT This paper examines the practices ordinary social media users employ to influence the content served to them by platform algorithms, and the relationship between these practices and levels of algorithmic literacy. Practices were documented across TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter (now X), YouTube and Reddit during 65 sessions, conducted as part of a digital ethnographic study of Australian social media users aged 18–30. The paper presents a taxonomy of curation practices, categorised as active or passive, and inviting or dissuading of content. The diversity of practices used by participants in the study points to a degree of user agency, exercised within proprietary algorithmic content systems, not previously explored in the literature. In the context of rising public concern about the harms of social media use, particularly to young people, and policy responses that focus on restricting access to social media, this paper offers a more nuanced account of user experiences online, foregrounding their agency, practical expertise and capacity to deploy protective strategies when engaging with algorithmically mediated content flows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Internet
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70063
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Literacy and Quotidian Curation Practices: Rethinking User Agency in the Social Media Regulation Era

Agata Stepnik, Joanne Elizabeth Gray
Policy & Internet
Social Media and Politics
article

Algorithmic Literacy and Quotidian Curation Practices: Rethinking User Agency in the Social Media Regulation Era

Agata Stepnik, Joanne Elizabeth Gray
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the practices ordinary social media users employ to influence the content served to them by platform algorithms, and the relationship between these practices and levels of algorithmic literacy. Practices were documented across TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter (now X), YouTube and Reddit during 65 sessions, conducted as part of a digital ethnographic study of Australian social media users aged 18–30. The paper presents a taxonomy of curation practices, categorised as active or passive, and inviting or dissuading of content. The diversity of practices used by participants in the study points to a degree of user agency, exercised within proprietary algorithmic content systems, not previously explored in the literature. In the context of rising public concern about the harms of social media use, particularly to young people, and policy responses that focus on restricting access to social media, this paper offers a more nuanced account of user experiences online, foregrounding their agency, practical expertise and capacity to deploy protective strategies when engaging with algorithmically mediated content flows.

Policy & InternetVol. 18(4)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.