Toward Autonomous Extraction and Building of Machine-Readable Molecular Models from Publications Using Large Language Models

Abstract Force field models are one of the central pillars of molecular simulations. A large number of molecular force field models has been developed in the past decades─mostly published in scientific papers. Building machine-readable force field input files for simulation engines is a tedious and error-prone task. We developed a method for extracting and building force field files from publications using large language models (LLMs). We have tested the new method by extracting 114 force field models from 21 scientific publications. The studied force fields comprise 6–74 parameters that were automatically extracted, identified, annotated, and allocated. We have compared the performance of different LLMs, namely Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and GPT-4o. Overall, they yield similar performance─yet there are important differences in individual cases. The overall best performance was obtained by the Gemini 2.5 Pro LLM. The force field parameters were extracted and identified with an accuracy of 94.0% using the Gemini 2.5 Pro LLM. The new LLM-assisted extraction method drastically reduces the time required for building force field files. Nevertheless, human-in-the-loop verification is still indispensable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c02128
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Autonomous Extraction and Building of Machine-Readable Molecular Models from Publications Using Large Language Models

Simon Stephan, Silvia Chiacchiera, Amila Akagić, Martin Horsch et al.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Toward Autonomous Extraction and Building of Machine-Readable Molecular Models from Publications Using Large Language Models

Simon Stephan, Silvia Chiacchiera, Amila Akagić, Martin Horsch, Fadi Al Machot, Florian Fleckenstein, Volodymyr Rodin, Isabell Dieudonné
article en

Abstract

Abstract Force field models are one of the central pillars of molecular simulations. A large number of molecular force field models has been developed in the past decades─mostly published in scientific papers. Building machine-readable force field input files for simulation engines is a tedious and error-prone task. We developed a method for extracting and building force field files from publications using large language models (LLMs). We have tested the new method by extracting 114 force field models from 21 scientific publications. The studied force fields comprise 6–74 parameters that were automatically extracted, identified, annotated, and allocated. We have compared the performance of different LLMs, namely Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude 4 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and GPT-4o. Overall, they yield similar performance─yet there are important differences in individual cases. The overall best performance was obtained by the Gemini 2.5 Pro LLM. The force field parameters were extracted and identified with an accuracy of 94.0% using the Gemini 2.5 Pro LLM. The new LLM-assisted extraction method drastically reduces the time required for building force field files. Nevertheless, human-in-the-loop verification is still indispensable.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
University of Sarajevo (BA), Science and Technology Facilities Council (GB), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.