Global Patterns of Epistemic Hierarchy and Dependency in Scientific Research

ABSTRACT The last three decades have witnessed significant transformations in global research systems. Increased scholarly mobility and enhanced connectivity across countries have boosted the globalization of academia. While the global nature and complexity of the international research system are undisputed, there is less agreement among scholars on its basis and contemporary development. This article starts by describing two divergent views on these issues: one based on the idea that the scope of rationality and efficiency in scientific endeavours is continuously spreading from Global North to Global South countries; and a second one that focuses on material inequalities and epistemic dependencies between these world regions. By drawing on the frameworks of dependency theories and the world‐systems approach, the authors provide a descriptive empirical analysis that supports the latter perspective. They use their findings to discuss how future research could focus on the mechanisms that fuel these inequalities and thereby promote a more inclusive, truly global research environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Development and Change
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70087
Primary Topic
World Systems and Global Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Patterns of Epistemic Hierarchy and Dependency in Scientific Research

Andrés F. Castro Torres, Maurizio Esposito, Aliakbar Akbaritabar
Development and Change
World Systems and Global Transformations
article

Global Patterns of Epistemic Hierarchy and Dependency in Scientific Research

Andrés F. Castro Torres, Maurizio Esposito, Aliakbar Akbaritabar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The last three decades have witnessed significant transformations in global research systems. Increased scholarly mobility and enhanced connectivity across countries have boosted the globalization of academia. While the global nature and complexity of the international research system are undisputed, there is less agreement among scholars on its basis and contemporary development. This article starts by describing two divergent views on these issues: one based on the idea that the scope of rationality and efficiency in scientific endeavours is continuously spreading from Global North to Global South countries; and a second one that focuses on material inequalities and epistemic dependencies between these world regions. By drawing on the frameworks of dependency theories and the world‐systems approach, the authors provide a descriptive empirical analysis that supports the latter perspective. They use their findings to discuss how future research could focus on the mechanisms that fuel these inequalities and thereby promote a more inclusive, truly global research environment.

Development and Change
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
World Systems and Global Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Patterns of Epistemic Hierarchy and Dependency in Scientific Research — Andrés F. Castro Torres, Maurizio Esposito, et al. · Development and Change (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS