Comparative Rheological and Physicochemical Characterization of Beeswax: Capping, Old Comb, and Foundation Wax

Beeswax is a beekeeping product used in comb foundation manufacturing and in cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food applications. Data on their physicochemical and rheological behavior remain scarce. We compared capping wax (CW), old comb wax (OW), and foundation wax (FW) from Apis mellifera. FTIR spectra were similar and melting points did not differ significantly (65–66 °C). Color was the most sensitive solid-state property, differing among all samples. At 80 °C, density (821–822 kg·m−3) and surface tension (39–41 mN·m−1) were similar. Under concentric-cylinder geometry, flow curves followed the Power Law model, with n = 1.121–1.153, indicating slight shear-thickening behavior; all individual replicate fits returned n > 1, with no statistical differences among wax types. Viscosity remained constant for 30 min at 400 s−1, indicating no thixotropy or rheopexy. A stirrer-type relative geometry returned higher apparent indices (1.734–1.899) and viscosities (45–50 mPa·s); being non-viscometric, these are process descriptors rather than intrinsic constants. Oscillatory rheology near the solid–liquid transition was more discriminating: unlike CW and OW, FW showed no elastic-to-viscous crossover in any replicate within the analyzed strain range. The distinct response of FW may reflect differences in microstructural organization rather than chemical composition, a hypothesis that remains to be confirmed and is potentially relevant to stamping, rolling, and molding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16199901
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Rheological and Physicochemical Characterization of Beeswax: Capping, Old Comb, and Foundation Wax

Elizabeth Troncoso, Camila Mella, Carolina Quezada, Karen P. Yáñez et al.
Applied Sciences
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
article

Comparative Rheological and Physicochemical Characterization of Beeswax: Capping, Old Comb, and Foundation Wax

Elizabeth Troncoso, Camila Mella, Carolina Quezada, Karen P. Yáñez, Daniel Ramírez, Ramón Arias
article en

Abstract

Beeswax is a beekeeping product used in comb foundation manufacturing and in cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food applications. Data on their physicochemical and rheological behavior remain scarce. We compared capping wax (CW), old comb wax (OW), and foundation wax (FW) from Apis mellifera. FTIR spectra were similar and melting points did not differ significantly (65–66 °C). Color was the most sensitive solid-state property, differing among all samples. At 80 °C, density (821–822 kg·m−3) and surface tension (39–41 mN·m−1) were similar. Under concentric-cylinder geometry, flow curves followed the Power Law model, with n = 1.121–1.153, indicating slight shear-thickening behavior; all individual replicate fits returned n > 1, with no statistical differences among wax types. Viscosity remained constant for 30 min at 400 s−1, indicating no thixotropy or rheopexy. A stirrer-type relative geometry returned higher apparent indices (1.734–1.899) and viscosities (45–50 mPa·s); being non-viscometric, these are process descriptors rather than intrinsic constants. Oscillatory rheology near the solid–liquid transition was more discriminating: unlike CW and OW, FW showed no elastic-to-viscous crossover in any replicate within the analyzed strain range. The distinct response of FW may reflect differences in microstructural organization rather than chemical composition, a hypothesis that remains to be confirmed and is potentially relevant to stamping, rolling, and molding.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(19)
Metropolitan University of Technology (CL), Federico Santa María Technical University (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Rheological and Physicochemical Characterization of Beeswax: Capping, Old Comb, and Foundation Wax — Elizabeth Troncoso, Camila Mella, et al. · Applied Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS