AI Jailbreaks: From Bypassing Restrictions to Governing Authority

AI jailbreaks are attempts to bypass models’ behavioral restrictions, but their significance increases when models operate tools and coordinate actions. This article presents a critical narrative review of the problem’s development, distinguishes jailbreaks, prompt injection and authority violations, and examines attacks, defenses and evaluation methods. Through the SGAEIA lens, it proposes an analytical synthesis with three levels: model response, authorized action and observed effect. This contribution is conceptual and non-normative; it does not demonstrate the architecture’s effectiveness or claim an unprecedented discovery. The conclusion is that behavioral robustness, authority boundaries and execution evidence should be evaluated together, with explicit assumptions and residual risk. **Keywords:** AI; jailbreak; prompt injection; autonomous agents; authority; governance; SGAEIA; assurance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23193016
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Jailbreaks: From Bypassing Restrictions to Governing Authority

Aridio Silva
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

AI Jailbreaks: From Bypassing Restrictions to Governing Authority

Aridio Silva
article en

Abstract

AI jailbreaks are attempts to bypass models’ behavioral restrictions, but their significance increases when models operate tools and coordinate actions. This article presents a critical narrative review of the problem’s development, distinguishes jailbreaks, prompt injection and authority violations, and examines attacks, defenses and evaluation methods. Through the SGAEIA lens, it proposes an analytical synthesis with three levels: model response, authorized action and observed effect. This contribution is conceptual and non-normative; it does not demonstrate the architecture’s effectiveness or claim an unprecedented discovery. The conclusion is that behavioral robustness, authority boundaries and execution evidence should be evaluated together, with explicit assumptions and residual risk. **Keywords:** AI; jailbreak; prompt injection; autonomous agents; authority; governance; SGAEIA; assurance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.