Contamination Beyond Pesticides in Museum Collections: NAGPRA Compliance, Collaboration, and Culturally Informed Care

ABSTRACT Despite the NAGPRA regulatory requirement to report known hazardous substances such as pesticides and other applications found in collections that may cause contamination to lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations, museums often know little about this issue. Reporting known contamination in museums generally follows the commonly known “Western” definition of contamination as connected to chemical toxicity and the dangers presented to Tribes and museum personnel when working with contaminated collections. This definition follows the dominant system in which contamination and toxicity are understood but often omits other forms of contamination implied by the interconnectedness of beings, items, and contamination. This paper examines ways that the notion of contamination itself is interactive, implying that other forms of contamination, including spiritual and cultural, may not only threaten and cause harm to the Ancestral human remains and items under care, but also other entities that may come into contact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Museum Anthropology
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/muan.70049
Primary Topic
Conservation Techniques and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contamination Beyond Pesticides in Museum Collections: NAGPRA Compliance, Collaboration, and Culturally Informed Care

Kathleen S. Fine‐Dare, Natalie Patton, Kate A. Compton-Gore, Chance Ward
Museum Anthropology
Conservation Techniques and Studies
article

Contamination Beyond Pesticides in Museum Collections: NAGPRA Compliance, Collaboration, and Culturally Informed Care

Kathleen S. Fine‐Dare, Natalie Patton, Kate A. Compton-Gore, Chance Ward
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the NAGPRA regulatory requirement to report known hazardous substances such as pesticides and other applications found in collections that may cause contamination to lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations, museums often know little about this issue. Reporting known contamination in museums generally follows the commonly known “Western” definition of contamination as connected to chemical toxicity and the dangers presented to Tribes and museum personnel when working with contaminated collections. This definition follows the dominant system in which contamination and toxicity are understood but often omits other forms of contamination implied by the interconnectedness of beings, items, and contamination. This paper examines ways that the notion of contamination itself is interactive, implying that other forms of contamination, including spiritual and cultural, may not only threaten and cause harm to the Ancestral human remains and items under care, but also other entities that may come into contact.

Museum AnthropologyVol. 50(1)
Museum Of Northern Arizona (US), Denver Art Museum (US), Fort Lewis College (US), Denver Museum of Nature and Science (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Conservation Techniques and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contamination Beyond Pesticides in Museum Collections: NAGPRA Compliance, Collaboration, and Culturally Informed Care — Kathleen S. Fine‐Dare, Natalie Patton, et al. · Museum Anthropology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS