Curriculum-Aligned AR for Secondary Physics: Learning and Engagement in Circular Motion and Magnetic Force

Static diagrams inherently flatten the dynamic, three-dimensional interplay of forces and motion, leaving secondary students reliant on imagination to grasp invisible vectors—a challenge consistently documented in high-stakes physics examinations. While augmented reality (AR) offers a promising medium to externalise these abstractions, rigorous classroom evidence comparing theory-driven, curriculum-aligned AR with standard instructional materials remains scarce. Grounded in Variation Theory, Cognitive Load Theory, and Constructivism, this study evaluated a smartphone-based AR application featuring seven 3-D models tightly mapped to the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (HKDSE) physics syllabus. Evaluating N = 171 Form 4 students (Grade 10 equivalent, aged 15–16) across nine classes in seven secondary schools, we employed a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test crossover design comparing AR against equivalent textbook images. Learning outcomes were measured using brief, 5-item HKDSE-aligned conceptual assessments, while classroom engagement was tracked through structured observations of visual on-task behaviour and spontaneous questions, supplemented by an 8-item student perception survey (N = 103). Paired- and independent-sample t-tests were used to evaluate pre-/post-test gains and group differences. Results confirmed that AR produced significantly larger conceptual gains than textbook images for both circular motion (d = 0.32, small-to-medium effect) and magnetic force (d = 0.48, medium effect). Furthermore, AR sustained significantly higher visual on-task behaviour and elicited more spontaneous content-relevant questions across classes (sign test, p = 0.008). Student perceptions confirmed that the majority found AR interesting (81.6%) and visually superior to textbooks (73.8%). We conclude that short, curriculum-embedded AR visualisations grounded in systematic variation enhance conceptual performance and foster an inquiry-oriented classroom atmosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16101652
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curriculum-Aligned AR for Secondary Physics: Learning and Engagement in Circular Motion and Magnetic Force

Max T. C. Wong, Jianhua Hao, Shu Ping Lau, Chi Wah Leung et al.
Education Sciences
Augmented Reality Applications
article

Curriculum-Aligned AR for Secondary Physics: Learning and Engagement in Circular Motion and Magnetic Force

Max T. C. Wong, Jianhua Hao, Shu Ping Lau, Chi Wah Leung, 陈远柔, Chee Leung Mak, Kwok Lung Jim, Safayet Ahmed, Yuen Hong Tsang, Yaseen Shafayet, Humaira Binte Habib Hima, Kai Tik Lee, Ka Lai Wong, Siu Hong Choy
article en

Abstract

Static diagrams inherently flatten the dynamic, three-dimensional interplay of forces and motion, leaving secondary students reliant on imagination to grasp invisible vectors—a challenge consistently documented in high-stakes physics examinations. While augmented reality (AR) offers a promising medium to externalise these abstractions, rigorous classroom evidence comparing theory-driven, curriculum-aligned AR with standard instructional materials remains scarce. Grounded in Variation Theory, Cognitive Load Theory, and Constructivism, this study evaluated a smartphone-based AR application featuring seven 3-D models tightly mapped to the Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (HKDSE) physics syllabus. Evaluating N = 171 Form 4 students (Grade 10 equivalent, aged 15–16) across nine classes in seven secondary schools, we employed a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test crossover design comparing AR against equivalent textbook images. Learning outcomes were measured using brief, 5-item HKDSE-aligned conceptual assessments, while classroom engagement was tracked through structured observations of visual on-task behaviour and spontaneous questions, supplemented by an 8-item student perception survey (N = 103). Paired- and independent-sample t-tests were used to evaluate pre-/post-test gains and group differences. Results confirmed that AR produced significantly larger conceptual gains than textbook images for both circular motion (d = 0.32, small-to-medium effect) and magnetic force (d = 0.48, medium effect). Furthermore, AR sustained significantly higher visual on-task behaviour and elicited more spontaneous content-relevant questions across classes (sign test, p = 0.008). Student perceptions confirmed that the majority found AR interesting (81.6%) and visually superior to textbooks (73.8%). We conclude that short, curriculum-embedded AR visualisations grounded in systematic variation enhance conceptual performance and foster an inquiry-oriented classroom atmosphere.

Education SciencesVol. 16(10)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.