Safety and health of workers in post-disaster reconstruction: a scoping review and evidence map

Post-disaster reconstruction (PDR) is essential for restoring damaged communities, yet the occupational safety and health (OSH) of PDR workers remains poorly understood. Although PDR involves many familiar construction hazards, these risks arise under distinct conditions, including damaged infrastructure, compressed recovery timelines, environmental contamination, fragmented governance, and pressure for visible recovery. This scoping review and evidence map examined peer-reviewed and authoritative gray literature on OSH among PDR workers. Following PRISMA-ScR guidance, the review used a Population-Concept-Context framework to search bibliographic databases and targeted organizational sources for English-language literature published from 2005 to 2025. The final evidence base included 55 sources, comprising 40 peer-reviewed publications and 15 gray literature documents. The review identified a geographically uneven and thematically concentrated evidence base, with strong representation from the United States and multi-country sources, and greater attention to multi-hazard and earthquake-related contexts than to other disaster types. Findings show that PDR workers face overlapping OSH hazards and exposures. Evidence was strongest for early recovery tasks such as debris removal, demolition, and cleanup, while later reconstruction phases, informal labor, volunteers, undocumented workers, and self-recovery residents remained underexamined. The review also highlights major methodological, policy, and practice gaps, including limited longitudinal evidence, inconsistent outcome measures, weak surveillance, and insufficient worker-specific protections. By integrating peer-reviewed and gray literature, this review frames PDR as a distinct OSH context and develops Faster Reconstruction Syndrome as a concept, interpreted through Job Demands-Resources and safety-climate theory to explain how recovery-speed pressures may weaken worker protection in disaster recovery policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107505
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and health of workers in post-disaster reconstruction: a scoping review and evidence map

Shane Crawford, Solomon Sesesie Ajasa
1 citations
Safety Science
Occupational Health and Safety Research
7.58
article

Safety and health of workers in post-disaster reconstruction: a scoping review and evidence map

Shane Crawford, Solomon Sesesie Ajasa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Post-disaster reconstruction (PDR) is essential for restoring damaged communities, yet the occupational safety and health (OSH) of PDR workers remains poorly understood. Although PDR involves many familiar construction hazards, these risks arise under distinct conditions, including damaged infrastructure, compressed recovery timelines, environmental contamination, fragmented governance, and pressure for visible recovery. This scoping review and evidence map examined peer-reviewed and authoritative gray literature on OSH among PDR workers. Following PRISMA-ScR guidance, the review used a Population-Concept-Context framework to search bibliographic databases and targeted organizational sources for English-language literature published from 2005 to 2025. The final evidence base included 55 sources, comprising 40 peer-reviewed publications and 15 gray literature documents. The review identified a geographically uneven and thematically concentrated evidence base, with strong representation from the United States and multi-country sources, and greater attention to multi-hazard and earthquake-related contexts than to other disaster types. Findings show that PDR workers face overlapping OSH hazards and exposures. Evidence was strongest for early recovery tasks such as debris removal, demolition, and cleanup, while later reconstruction phases, informal labor, volunteers, undocumented workers, and self-recovery residents remained underexamined. The review also highlights major methodological, policy, and practice gaps, including limited longitudinal evidence, inconsistent outcome measures, weak surveillance, and insufficient worker-specific protections. By integrating peer-reviewed and gray literature, this review frames PDR as a distinct OSH context and develops Faster Reconstruction Syndrome as a concept, interpreted through Job Demands-Resources and safety-climate theory to explain how recovery-speed pressures may weaken worker protection in disaster recovery policy and practice.

Safety ScienceVol. 206
University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
7.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety and health of workers in post-disaster reconstruction: a scoping review and evidence map — Shane Crawford, Solomon Sesesie Ajasa · Safety Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS