Comparative Botulinum Toxin Injection Strategies Beyond the Masseter for Bruxism: A Scoping Review

Background: Botulinum toxin type A is used to reduce excessive masticatory muscle activity in bruxism, but whether extending injection beyond the masseter provides additional benefit remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to map comparative evidence on expanded botulinum toxin muscle targeting for bruxism and assess whether available studies provide evidence of incremental clinical benefit beyond masseter-only injection. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to 3 August 2026. Eligible studies directly compared botulinum toxin injection strategies differing in the muscles targeted. Data were charted and synthesized descriptively. The protocol was prospectively registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202680008). Results: Five small randomized trials involving 133 participants were included, of whom 116 contributed to the comparative analyses. Expanded strategies added the temporalis, anterior digastric, lateral pterygoid, or medial pterygoid. Additional clinical benefit of broader targeting was not clearly demonstrated, although some studies reported greater reductions in activity of the additionally injected muscle. In all studies, the masseter dose was held constant while additional muscles were injected, resulting in higher total toxin doses and preventing separation of anatomical targeting effects from dose escalation. Safety evidence was insufficient because reporting was limited and heterogeneous, and the small overall sample precluded adequate characterization of the safety profile. Conclusions: The available evidence is preliminary and insufficient to determine whether routinely extending botulinum toxin injection beyond the masseter provides additional clinical benefit. Future adequately powered, dose-controlled trials should prioritize patient-important outcomes and distinguish the effects of anatomical targeting from total toxin dose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15197712
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Botulinum Toxin Injection Strategies Beyond the Masseter for Bruxism: A Scoping Review

Weeratian Tawanwongsri, Chime Eden, Doungkamol Siri-Archawawat, Arunrat Dumkliang
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Comparative Botulinum Toxin Injection Strategies Beyond the Masseter for Bruxism: A Scoping Review

Weeratian Tawanwongsri, Chime Eden, Doungkamol Siri-Archawawat, Arunrat Dumkliang
article en

Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxin type A is used to reduce excessive masticatory muscle activity in bruxism, but whether extending injection beyond the masseter provides additional benefit remains uncertain. This scoping review aimed to map comparative evidence on expanded botulinum toxin muscle targeting for bruxism and assess whether available studies provide evidence of incremental clinical benefit beyond masseter-only injection. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to 3 August 2026. Eligible studies directly compared botulinum toxin injection strategies differing in the muscles targeted. Data were charted and synthesized descriptively. The protocol was prospectively registered with INPLASY (INPLASY202680008). Results: Five small randomized trials involving 133 participants were included, of whom 116 contributed to the comparative analyses. Expanded strategies added the temporalis, anterior digastric, lateral pterygoid, or medial pterygoid. Additional clinical benefit of broader targeting was not clearly demonstrated, although some studies reported greater reductions in activity of the additionally injected muscle. In all studies, the masseter dose was held constant while additional muscles were injected, resulting in higher total toxin doses and preventing separation of anatomical targeting effects from dose escalation. Safety evidence was insufficient because reporting was limited and heterogeneous, and the small overall sample precluded adequate characterization of the safety profile. Conclusions: The available evidence is preliminary and insufficient to determine whether routinely extending botulinum toxin injection beyond the masseter provides additional clinical benefit. Future adequately powered, dose-controlled trials should prioritize patient-important outcomes and distinguish the effects of anatomical targeting from total toxin dose.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(19)
Teaching Hospital Kandy (LK), Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University (TH), Walailak University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.