Publishing Replication Research: A Myth-Busting Approach to Removing Replication Barriers

Abstract: As management and organizational psychology scholars publicly embrace replication research, some note that journals have been slow to publish replication research. Yet, the reasons why many journals have published a limited number of replications remain unclear. It is plausible that a supply problem (i. e., scholars are not conducting replication research) is contributing to the relative absence of replication in management and organizational psychology research. Academic conferences routinely host workshops on conducting replication research and several publications provide guidance on conducting replication research. Therefore, there are clear calls for replication research along with reasonable resources available to interested scholars. In this primer, I consider factors that prevent scholars from engaging in replication research as I take a “myth-busting” approach to addressing some of the most common misconceptions about replication research. The primer closes with suggestions for scholars who are interested in undertaking the challenge of replication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000489
Primary Topic
Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publishing Replication Research: A Myth-Busting Approach to Removing Replication Barriers

William G. Obenauer
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
article

Publishing Replication Research: A Myth-Busting Approach to Removing Replication Barriers

William G. Obenauer
article en

Abstract

Abstract: As management and organizational psychology scholars publicly embrace replication research, some note that journals have been slow to publish replication research. Yet, the reasons why many journals have published a limited number of replications remain unclear. It is plausible that a supply problem (i. e., scholars are not conducting replication research) is contributing to the relative absence of replication in management and organizational psychology research. Academic conferences routinely host workshops on conducting replication research and several publications provide guidance on conducting replication research. Therefore, there are clear calls for replication research along with reasonable resources available to interested scholars. In this primer, I consider factors that prevent scholars from engaging in replication research as I take a “myth-busting” approach to addressing some of the most common misconceptions about replication research. The primer closes with suggestions for scholars who are interested in undertaking the challenge of replication.

Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
University of Maine School of Law (US), University of Southern Maine (US), University of Maine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.