Sandwich dural reconstruction versus conventional artificial dural patch repair for watertight closure after supratentorial craniotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Achieving watertight dural closure after craniotomy remains technically challenging because of dural retraction and tissue defects. Conventional artificial dural substitutes may fail to achieve a reliable seal and can lead to postoperative complications such as subcutaneous fluid collection, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) incisional leakage, and postoperative pneumocephalus. To address these limitations, we developed a novel sandwich dural reconstruction technique designed to improve sealing efficiency and reduce postoperative complications. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. This prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will enroll 244 patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the sandwich dural reconstruction group or the conventional artificial dural patch repair group. The primary outcome is postoperative incisional CSF leakage within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative subcutaneous fluid collection, postoperative pneumocephalus, surgical site infection, duration of dural reconstruction, and length of hospital stay. Outcome assessors and statisticians will remain blinded to group allocation. Participants will be followed for 3 months postoperatively. This randomized controlled trial will provide clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of the sandwich dural reconstruction technique for achieving watertight dural closure after supratentorial craniotomy. If proven effective, this technique may offer a practical strategy to reduce postoperative wound-related complications and improve surgical outcomes. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), http://www.chictr.org.cn ; ChiCTR2400091344. Registered on 26 October 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-10041-w
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sandwich dural reconstruction versus conventional artificial dural patch repair for watertight closure after supratentorial craniotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Xiang Yang, Yujian Li, Jun Zheng, Huiqing Zhou et al.
Trials
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
article

Sandwich dural reconstruction versus conventional artificial dural patch repair for watertight closure after supratentorial craniotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Xiang Yang, Yujian Li, Jun Zheng, Huiqing Zhou, Haotian Lv, Mingzhu Ma
article en

Abstract

Achieving watertight dural closure after craniotomy remains technically challenging because of dural retraction and tissue defects. Conventional artificial dural substitutes may fail to achieve a reliable seal and can lead to postoperative complications such as subcutaneous fluid collection, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) incisional leakage, and postoperative pneumocephalus. To address these limitations, we developed a novel sandwich dural reconstruction technique designed to improve sealing efficiency and reduce postoperative complications. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. This prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will enroll 244 patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the sandwich dural reconstruction group or the conventional artificial dural patch repair group. The primary outcome is postoperative incisional CSF leakage within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative subcutaneous fluid collection, postoperative pneumocephalus, surgical site infection, duration of dural reconstruction, and length of hospital stay. Outcome assessors and statisticians will remain blinded to group allocation. Participants will be followed for 3 months postoperatively. This randomized controlled trial will provide clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of the sandwich dural reconstruction technique for achieving watertight dural closure after supratentorial craniotomy. If proven effective, this technique may offer a practical strategy to reduce postoperative wound-related complications and improve surgical outcomes. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), http://www.chictr.org.cn ; ChiCTR2400091344. Registered on 26 October 2024.

Trials
Sichuan University (CN), West China Medical Center of Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.