Machines Can Produce What We Speak in the Brain: A Linguistic Framework for Decoding Inner Speech

When we rehearse a sentence silently, such as ‘Hi, what’s up?’ before greeting a friend, the brain runs much of the machinery of speaking without moving a muscle. This paper asks, from a linguistic perspective, how a machine could turn that silent speech into words. We propose a framework in two parts. The first is a measurement programme that moves from overt to covert speech in controlled steps. Phonemes are first mapped while they are spoken aloud (data-A). Articulatory and laryngeal layers are then removed one at a time to isolate the neural correlates of individual distinctive features (data-B). Finally, the same items are only imagined (data-C). The second part is an inference cascade. Noisy, phoneme-level neural evidence is resolved by successive layers of linguistic knowledge: phonotactics, prosodic timing, the lexicon, morphosyntax, semantics, and discourse. A worked example shows how the fragmentary signal H..y, w…tz ..p converges on a single utterance. We argue that the phoneme is the right unit for decoding because of duality of patterning: a small, closed inventory generates an open-ended vocabulary. This architecture converges with that of current speech neuroprostheses, which pair phoneme decoders with language models and have recently begun to decode inner speech. The linguistic analysis adds three cautions that such systems rarely state. Inner speech may be condensed rather than merely noisy. A strong language model can end up writing the speaker’s sentence for them. And only inner speech addressed to someone should be decoded at all. I am open to reviews or comments on this work, as well as collaborations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23184990
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Machines Can Produce What We Speak in the Brain: A Linguistic Framework for Decoding Inner Speech

Madan Mohan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
preprint

Machines Can Produce What We Speak in the Brain: A Linguistic Framework for Decoding Inner Speech

Madan Mohan
preprint en

Abstract

When we rehearse a sentence silently, such as ‘Hi, what’s up?’ before greeting a friend, the brain runs much of the machinery of speaking without moving a muscle. This paper asks, from a linguistic perspective, how a machine could turn that silent speech into words. We propose a framework in two parts. The first is a measurement programme that moves from overt to covert speech in controlled steps. Phonemes are first mapped while they are spoken aloud (data-A). Articulatory and laryngeal layers are then removed one at a time to isolate the neural correlates of individual distinctive features (data-B). Finally, the same items are only imagined (data-C). The second part is an inference cascade. Noisy, phoneme-level neural evidence is resolved by successive layers of linguistic knowledge: phonotactics, prosodic timing, the lexicon, morphosyntax, semantics, and discourse. A worked example shows how the fragmentary signal H..y, w…tz ..p converges on a single utterance. We argue that the phoneme is the right unit for decoding because of duality of patterning: a small, closed inventory generates an open-ended vocabulary. This architecture converges with that of current speech neuroprostheses, which pair phoneme decoders with language models and have recently begun to decode inner speech. The linguistic analysis adds three cautions that such systems rarely state. Inner speech may be condensed rather than merely noisy. A strong language model can end up writing the speaker’s sentence for them. And only inner speech addressed to someone should be decoded at all. I am open to reviews or comments on this work, as well as collaborations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.