Considerations for the Integration of Clinical Trials and Real‐World Data

As clinical decision-making increasingly moves toward individualized and context-specific treatment recommendations, reliance on any single evidence source, randomized or observational, may be insufficient. Principled integration of randomized controlled trials and real-world data, grounded in explicit causal frameworks, offers a path toward evidence that is both internally credible and externally relevant. In this article, we describe distinct objectives for the integration of randomized controlled trials and real-world data and discuss how these objectives shape key design and analytic considerations, illustrating the resulting choices through example estimands. We highlight practical issues that commonly arise in applied settings, including data relevance and curation, cross-source comparability, estimand specification, and sensitivity analysis. We aim for this article to help readers evaluate and implement principled approaches to integrating randomized controlled trials and real-world data in ways that can support more reliable treatment recommendations while maintaining regulatory-grade evidentiary standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70513
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for the Integration of Clinical Trials and Real‐World Data

Andrew N. Mertens, Larry Han, Charles E. Barr, Nerissa Nance et al.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Considerations for the Integration of Clinical Trials and Real‐World Data

Andrew N. Mertens, Larry Han, Charles E. Barr, Nerissa Nance, Salina P. Waddy, Kara E. Rudolph, Hana Lee, Lei Nie, Shawn Qiu, Margot Lisa-Jing Yann, Jens M. Tarp, Tianyue Zhou, Mark J. van der Laan, Kajsa Kvist, Lauren Dang, Maya Petersen, Andy Wilson, Zhiwei Zhang, Xu Shi, Kenneth Wiley
article en

Abstract

As clinical decision-making increasingly moves toward individualized and context-specific treatment recommendations, reliance on any single evidence source, randomized or observational, may be insufficient. Principled integration of randomized controlled trials and real-world data, grounded in explicit causal frameworks, offers a path toward evidence that is both internally credible and externally relevant. In this article, we describe distinct objectives for the integration of randomized controlled trials and real-world data and discuss how these objectives shape key design and analytic considerations, illustrating the resulting choices through example estimands. We highlight practical issues that commonly arise in applied settings, including data relevance and curation, cross-source comparability, estimand specification, and sensitivity analysis. We aim for this article to help readers evaluate and implement principled approaches to integrating randomized controlled trials and real-world data in ways that can support more reliable treatment recommendations while maintaining regulatory-grade evidentiary standards.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Northeastern University (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), University of Utah (US), Brown University (US), University of Michigan (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Columbia University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.