Reporting European Council Politics at Home: A Comparative Study of How Chief Executives Communicate Towards Their National Parliaments

Abstract Decisions by the European Council have shaped the history of European integration, especially in moments of crisis for the European Union (EU). Yet, this institution has faced substantial criticism, partly because it is not politically accountable to any other EU institution. Most members have responsibilities towards their national parliaments derived from their position as Heads of Government. This article scrutinizes communication patterns, analyzing whether crises affect the way national chief executives communicate to their parliaments about their European Council‐related activities. It argues that moments of crisis lead to an increase in reporting, justification of decisions, and expressed support for EU‐level problem‐solving. Examining the communication of national chief executives in Germany, Ireland, and Italy about irregular migration in the EU between April 2015 and March 2021, the article finds support for these assumptions. Remaining variation can be linked to these countries' different institutional provisions and crisis affectedness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Swiss Political Science Review
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.70053
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting European Council Politics at Home: A Comparative Study of How Chief Executives Communicate Towards Their National Parliaments

Lucas Schramm, Antonia Dambach
Swiss Political Science Review
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Reporting European Council Politics at Home: A Comparative Study of How Chief Executives Communicate Towards Their National Parliaments

Lucas Schramm, Antonia Dambach
article en

Abstract

Abstract Decisions by the European Council have shaped the history of European integration, especially in moments of crisis for the European Union (EU). Yet, this institution has faced substantial criticism, partly because it is not politically accountable to any other EU institution. Most members have responsibilities towards their national parliaments derived from their position as Heads of Government. This article scrutinizes communication patterns, analyzing whether crises affect the way national chief executives communicate to their parliaments about their European Council‐related activities. It argues that moments of crisis lead to an increase in reporting, justification of decisions, and expressed support for EU‐level problem‐solving. Examining the communication of national chief executives in Germany, Ireland, and Italy about irregular migration in the EU between April 2015 and March 2021, the article finds support for these assumptions. Remaining variation can be linked to these countries' different institutional provisions and crisis affectedness.

Swiss Political Science Review
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.