Evaluation of Time to Metastasis After Prostatectomy as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Metachronous mHSPC: A Secondary Analysis of the SWOG‐1216 Phase 3 Trial

ABSTRACT Background The prognostic significance of time to metastasis (TTM) following radical prostatectomy in patients with metachronous metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains uncertain. We performed a secondary analysis of patient‐level data from the phase 3 SWOG 1216 randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether TTM is associated with progression‐free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Methods Among 1279 trial participants, 301 patients with metachronous mHSPC who had previously undergone prostatectomy were included. Participants were randomized to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus orteronel or ADT plus bicalutamide and followed through 2023. TTM was analyzed as both a continuous variable and using categorical thresholds ranging from 1 to 10 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for treatment arm, disease burden, Gleason score, performance status, prostate‐specific antigen, age, and prior ADT. Results Of the included patients, 161 received ADT plus orteronel and 140 received ADT plus bicalutamide; 38% had extensive disease. TTM was not associated with PFS when analyzed continuously (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; p = 0.30) or categorically across any threshold. Similarly, TTM was not associated with OS (continuous HR, 1.0; p = 0.14), with consistent findings across treatment arms. Conclusions In the secondary analysis of SWOG 1216, TTM was not independently associated with survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis. These findings suggest that TTM alone may not provide sufficient prognostic information to guide patient counseling, and treatment decisions after metastatic recurrence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Prostate
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70266
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Time to Metastasis After Prostatectomy as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Metachronous mHSPC: A Secondary Analysis of the SWOG‐1216 Phase 3 Trial

Yeonjung Jo, Benjamin Louis Maughan, Umang Swami, Zeynep İrem Özay et al.
The Prostate
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Evaluation of Time to Metastasis After Prostatectomy as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Metachronous mHSPC: A Secondary Analysis of the SWOG‐1216 Phase 3 Trial

Yeonjung Jo, Benjamin Louis Maughan, Umang Swami, Zeynep İrem Özay, Georges Gebrael, Melissa Plets, Maha Hussain, Seth P. Lerner, Amir Goldkorn, Primo N. Lara, Nicolas Sayegh, Tanya Barauskas Dorff, Neeraj Agarwal, Varun Nandakumar, Krishnam Goel, Haoran Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The prognostic significance of time to metastasis (TTM) following radical prostatectomy in patients with metachronous metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains uncertain. We performed a secondary analysis of patient‐level data from the phase 3 SWOG 1216 randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether TTM is associated with progression‐free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Methods Among 1279 trial participants, 301 patients with metachronous mHSPC who had previously undergone prostatectomy were included. Participants were randomized to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus orteronel or ADT plus bicalutamide and followed through 2023. TTM was analyzed as both a continuous variable and using categorical thresholds ranging from 1 to 10 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for treatment arm, disease burden, Gleason score, performance status, prostate‐specific antigen, age, and prior ADT. Results Of the included patients, 161 received ADT plus orteronel and 140 received ADT plus bicalutamide; 38% had extensive disease. TTM was not associated with PFS when analyzed continuously (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; p = 0.30) or categorically across any threshold. Similarly, TTM was not associated with OS (continuous HR, 1.0; p = 0.14), with consistent findings across treatment arms. Conclusions In the secondary analysis of SWOG 1216, TTM was not independently associated with survival outcomes in the multivariable analysis. These findings suggest that TTM alone may not provide sufficient prognostic information to guide patient counseling, and treatment decisions after metastatic recurrence.

The Prostate
Northwestern University (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), The University of Kansas Cancer Center (US), City of Hope (US), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Data Management Services (United States) (US), UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.