Physiological Effects of High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen vs. Pressure Support Ventilation in Neurosurgical Patients with Brain Tumors Facing Delayed Extubation: A Pilot Study

Abstract Background Postoperative neurosurgical patients who successfully pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) may still require delayed extubation due to impaired airway protection. Continued mechanical ventilation may contribute to diaphragm underuse. High-flow tracheal oxygen (HFTO) offers an alternative—discontinuing positive pressure while maintaining airway access—but its physiological effects in intubated neurosurgical patients remain poorly characterized. Methods In this prospective, randomized physiological pilot study, postoperative neurosurgical patients who required delayed extubation were assigned (1:1) to HFTO or low-level pressure support ventilation (PSV). Esophageal pressure monitoring and diaphragmatic ultrasound were performed at baseline and at 2, 12, 24, and 48 h. The primary endpoint was inspiratory effort assessed by esophageal pressure–time product (PTPes) per min. Secondary outcomes included diaphragmatic function, respiratory parameters, safety, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 24 patients were randomized; 1 patient was withdrawn due to intracranial rebleeding, leaving 23 patients for analysis (HFTO, n = 12; PSV, n = 11). HFTO exhibited a significantly different temporal trajectory in inspiratory effort (group-by-time interaction P = 0.019), characterized by an acute physiological step-up immediately after withdrawing positive pressure support, followed by a stable plateau from 2 to 48 h. Diaphragmatic indices remained unchanged in both groups over 48 h. Airway pressures were significantly lower in the HFTO group (all P < 0.001), accompanied by modest declines in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 )/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) and slight partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) increases. Respiratory deterioration rate was similar between groups (25.0% vs. 18.2%, P = 1.000). Ventilator-free days at day 28 were univariately higher with HFTO (27.0 [23.0–27.0] vs. 21.0 [17.0–24.0] days, P = 0.022); artificial airway-free days and ICU length of stay were comparable between groups. Conclusions HFTO was univariately associated with increased inspiratory effort compared with low-level PSV, without short-term diaphragmatic harm or increased clinical instability in postoperative neurosurgical patients requiring delayed extubation. These findings suggest HFTO as a feasible strategy for liberation from mechanical ventilation while maintaining airway safety. Larger multicenter studies are warranted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neurocritical Care
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-026-02656-3
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiological Effects of High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen vs. Pressure Support Ventilation in Neurosurgical Patients with Brain Tumors Facing Delayed Extubation: A Pilot Study

Zhou Jian-fan, Yanjuan Ma, Guang-Qiang Chen, Yi-Min Zhou et al.
Neurocritical Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Physiological Effects of High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen vs. Pressure Support Ventilation in Neurosurgical Patients with Brain Tumors Facing Delayed Extubation: A Pilot Study

Zhou Jian-fan, Yanjuan Ma, Guang-Qiang Chen, Yi-Min Zhou, Jian-Xin Zhou, Guang-Zhi Shi, Ye Tian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Postoperative neurosurgical patients who successfully pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) may still require delayed extubation due to impaired airway protection. Continued mechanical ventilation may contribute to diaphragm underuse. High-flow tracheal oxygen (HFTO) offers an alternative—discontinuing positive pressure while maintaining airway access—but its physiological effects in intubated neurosurgical patients remain poorly characterized. Methods In this prospective, randomized physiological pilot study, postoperative neurosurgical patients who required delayed extubation were assigned (1:1) to HFTO or low-level pressure support ventilation (PSV). Esophageal pressure monitoring and diaphragmatic ultrasound were performed at baseline and at 2, 12, 24, and 48 h. The primary endpoint was inspiratory effort assessed by esophageal pressure–time product (PTPes) per min. Secondary outcomes included diaphragmatic function, respiratory parameters, safety, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 24 patients were randomized; 1 patient was withdrawn due to intracranial rebleeding, leaving 23 patients for analysis (HFTO, n = 12; PSV, n = 11). HFTO exhibited a significantly different temporal trajectory in inspiratory effort (group-by-time interaction P = 0.019), characterized by an acute physiological step-up immediately after withdrawing positive pressure support, followed by a stable plateau from 2 to 48 h. Diaphragmatic indices remained unchanged in both groups over 48 h. Airway pressures were significantly lower in the HFTO group (all P < 0.001), accompanied by modest declines in partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 )/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) and slight partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) increases. Respiratory deterioration rate was similar between groups (25.0% vs. 18.2%, P = 1.000). Ventilator-free days at day 28 were univariately higher with HFTO (27.0 [23.0–27.0] vs. 21.0 [17.0–24.0] days, P = 0.022); artificial airway-free days and ICU length of stay were comparable between groups. Conclusions HFTO was univariately associated with increased inspiratory effort compared with low-level PSV, without short-term diaphragmatic harm or increased clinical instability in postoperative neurosurgical patients requiring delayed extubation. These findings suggest HFTO as a feasible strategy for liberation from mechanical ventilation while maintaining airway safety. Larger multicenter studies are warranted.

Neurocritical Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.