Evolution of symptoms, quality of life, and objective breathing markers in a prospective case series of patients with post-COVID-19 dysfunctional breathing

Abstract Dysfunctional breathing (DB) was described after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and can contribute to persistent dyspnoea and other associated symptoms but the evolution of DB after COVID-19 is poorly described. Individuals with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 were evaluated and those diagnosed with DB were included. DB was diagnosed by identifying an abnormal breathing pattern during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) associated with compatible symptoms after ruling out cardiopulmonary conditions that could account for the symptoms. All included patients were prospectively followed and systematically assessed 6–9 months after their diagnosis. Given the multiplicity of analyses and the absence of a pre-specified primary analysis, all findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Forty-eight patients were included and 45 patients were successfully reassessed at 6–9 months. Forty-two received specific respiratory physiotherapy targeting DB. The proportion of individuals with a Nijmegen score ≥ 23 decreased from 30 (68%) at baseline to 19 (43%) at follow-up ( p = 0.02). Dyspnea improved at 6–9 months, with 0%, 11%, 44%, 35%, and 11% of patients presenting mMRC grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 at baseline, compared with 20%, 39%, 37%, 4%, and 0% at follow-up ( p < 0.001). Improvements in quality of life and functional status were observed. However, 21 patients (47%) continued to experience significant functional limitations, defined as a post-COVID-19 functional status (PCFS) scale score ≥ 2. Objective markers of DB during CPET improved, with reductions in hyperventilation, dispersion of breathing parameters, and the number of sighs. In most patients diagnosed with DB after COVID-19, improvements in symptoms, QoL, functional status and objective markers of DB were observed at 6–9 months. A substantial proportion of patients remained disabled.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-72712-7
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of symptoms, quality of life, and objective breathing markers in a prospective case series of patients with post-COVID-19 dysfunctional breathing

Arnaud Rapillard, Isabelle Frésard, Alzbeta Binkova, Pierre‐Olivier Bridevaux et al.
Scientific Reports
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Evolution of symptoms, quality of life, and objective breathing markers in a prospective case series of patients with post-COVID-19 dysfunctional breathing

Arnaud Rapillard, Isabelle Frésard, Alzbeta Binkova, Pierre‐Olivier Bridevaux, Marco Altarelli, Antoine Beurnier, Stéphanie Vaudan, Cyril Jaksic, Léon Genecand, David Montani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dysfunctional breathing (DB) was described after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and can contribute to persistent dyspnoea and other associated symptoms but the evolution of DB after COVID-19 is poorly described. Individuals with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 were evaluated and those diagnosed with DB were included. DB was diagnosed by identifying an abnormal breathing pattern during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) associated with compatible symptoms after ruling out cardiopulmonary conditions that could account for the symptoms. All included patients were prospectively followed and systematically assessed 6–9 months after their diagnosis. Given the multiplicity of analyses and the absence of a pre-specified primary analysis, all findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Forty-eight patients were included and 45 patients were successfully reassessed at 6–9 months. Forty-two received specific respiratory physiotherapy targeting DB. The proportion of individuals with a Nijmegen score ≥ 23 decreased from 30 (68%) at baseline to 19 (43%) at follow-up ( p = 0.02). Dyspnea improved at 6–9 months, with 0%, 11%, 44%, 35%, and 11% of patients presenting mMRC grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 at baseline, compared with 20%, 39%, 37%, 4%, and 0% at follow-up ( p < 0.001). Improvements in quality of life and functional status were observed. However, 21 patients (47%) continued to experience significant functional limitations, defined as a post-COVID-19 functional status (PCFS) scale score ≥ 2. Objective markers of DB during CPET improved, with reductions in hyperventilation, dispersion of breathing parameters, and the number of sighs. In most patients diagnosed with DB after COVID-19, improvements in symptoms, QoL, functional status and objective markers of DB were observed at 6–9 months. A substantial proportion of patients remained disabled.

Scientific Reports
University of Geneva (CH), Inserm (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Hôpital Beau-Séjour (CH), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Hypertension pulmonaire : physiopathologie et innovation thérapeutique (FR), Hôpital de Sion (CH), Hôpital du Valais (CH), Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.