A Multidialectal and Culturally Grounded Benchmark for Mental Health Clinical Reasoning, Uncertainty, and Safety in Arabic

AbstractArabMindBench is a proposed multidialectal and culturally grounded benchmark for evaluating mental health artificial intelligence systems in Arabic. The benchmark focuses on clinical reasoning, uncertainty, missing-information detection, longitudinal interpretation, and safety-aware escalation across dialectal and culturally contextualized mental health narratives.The initial pilot focuses on Egyptian Arabic and a defined Saudi Arabic variety. Cases are authored natively in each dialect rather than translated, and cases representing the same clinical construct are linked through a shared concept identifier and independently reviewed for clinical equivalence.The benchmark evaluates five core tasks: risk detection, differential reasoning, missing-information identification, longitudinal reasoning, and safety/escalation. Abstention is evaluated as a cross-cutting capability using explicit information-sufficiency judgments. Independent expert annotations are retained, disagreement is preserved, and adjudication does not overwrite the original judgments. Safety-critical errors are reported separately as hard failures rather than being absorbed into a composite score.This record describes the research protocol and benchmark design prior to the completion of the pilot evaluation. No model-performance results are reported in this version. The planned development process begins with a 20-case dry run, followed by schema and annotation-guideline refinement and a planned 100–150-case feasibility pilot.Status: Pre-pilot research protocol.Clinical use: This benchmark is not a clinical decision-support system. Benchmark scores are not evidence of clinical safety and are not intended for diagnosis, treatment, or emergency decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23193131
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Multidialectal and Culturally Grounded Benchmark for Mental Health Clinical Reasoning, Uncertainty, and Safety in Arabic

mohamed salah ramdan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
preprint

A Multidialectal and Culturally Grounded Benchmark for Mental Health Clinical Reasoning, Uncertainty, and Safety in Arabic

mohamed salah ramdan
preprint en

Abstract

AbstractArabMindBench is a proposed multidialectal and culturally grounded benchmark for evaluating mental health artificial intelligence systems in Arabic. The benchmark focuses on clinical reasoning, uncertainty, missing-information detection, longitudinal interpretation, and safety-aware escalation across dialectal and culturally contextualized mental health narratives.The initial pilot focuses on Egyptian Arabic and a defined Saudi Arabic variety. Cases are authored natively in each dialect rather than translated, and cases representing the same clinical construct are linked through a shared concept identifier and independently reviewed for clinical equivalence.The benchmark evaluates five core tasks: risk detection, differential reasoning, missing-information identification, longitudinal reasoning, and safety/escalation. Abstention is evaluated as a cross-cutting capability using explicit information-sufficiency judgments. Independent expert annotations are retained, disagreement is preserved, and adjudication does not overwrite the original judgments. Safety-critical errors are reported separately as hard failures rather than being absorbed into a composite score.This record describes the research protocol and benchmark design prior to the completion of the pilot evaluation. No model-performance results are reported in this version. The planned development process begins with a 20-case dry run, followed by schema and annotation-guideline refinement and a planned 100–150-case feasibility pilot.Status: Pre-pilot research protocol.Clinical use: This benchmark is not a clinical decision-support system. Benchmark scores are not evidence of clinical safety and are not intended for diagnosis, treatment, or emergency decision-making.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.