The CARE Framework for Situated Ethical Deliberation About Artificial Intelligence

This conceptual paper introduces the CARE Framework for Situated Ethical Deliberation, a practice-oriented approach for evaluating specific uses of artificial intelligence in healthcare, behavioral health, social work, human services, and related professional settings. CARE organizes ethical deliberation around four interdependent dimensions: Context, Authority, Risk, and Engagement. Rather than treating an AI system as the sole unit of analysis, the framework examines a bounded use within a particular setting—including the people affected, the purpose of the technology, the authority assigned to it, the potential distribution of harms and benefits, and the role of meaningful human participation and relationships. The framework supports transparent, case-specific decisions about whether an AI use should proceed as proposed, proceed with safeguards, be narrowed or piloted, undergo additional review, be paused, be declined, or be discontinued. Contrasting practice scenarios demonstrate how ethical judgments may change when an AI system’s function, authority, context, consequences, or relational significance changes. CARE is presented as a conceptually grounded, practice-informed framework intended to complement—not replace—professional standards, technical validation, organizational governance, legal requirements, or discipline-specific review. It is offered for scholarly critique, professional application, refinement, and future empirical evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23188574
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CARE Framework for Situated Ethical Deliberation About Artificial Intelligence

Sarah J. Lewis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The CARE Framework for Situated Ethical Deliberation About Artificial Intelligence

Sarah J. Lewis
article en

Abstract

This conceptual paper introduces the CARE Framework for Situated Ethical Deliberation, a practice-oriented approach for evaluating specific uses of artificial intelligence in healthcare, behavioral health, social work, human services, and related professional settings. CARE organizes ethical deliberation around four interdependent dimensions: Context, Authority, Risk, and Engagement. Rather than treating an AI system as the sole unit of analysis, the framework examines a bounded use within a particular setting—including the people affected, the purpose of the technology, the authority assigned to it, the potential distribution of harms and benefits, and the role of meaningful human participation and relationships. The framework supports transparent, case-specific decisions about whether an AI use should proceed as proposed, proceed with safeguards, be narrowed or piloted, undergo additional review, be paused, be declined, or be discontinued. Contrasting practice scenarios demonstrate how ethical judgments may change when an AI system’s function, authority, context, consequences, or relational significance changes. CARE is presented as a conceptually grounded, practice-informed framework intended to complement—not replace—professional standards, technical validation, organizational governance, legal requirements, or discipline-specific review. It is offered for scholarly critique, professional application, refinement, and future empirical evaluation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Barry University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.