The Polycrisis and Systemic Change in Lithuania: From Fragmentation to Integration

ABSTRACT The main purpose of the article is to assess the impact of two interconnected crises—COVID‐19 and irregular migration—on systemic change in Lithuania between 2020 and 2024. We examine how the country's response to the polycrisis has led to reforms in its crisis management system. Our theoretical framework integrates ideas from new institutionalism, complexity theory, and multi‐level governance to examine the impact of a polycrisis characterised by the simultaneous pressures of a global pandemic and authoritarian hybrid aggression, which constitutes the article's main conceptual novelty. Focusing on Lithuania, the article draws on comparative results of two case studies. Methodologically, these studies employ the process tracing method to assess how empirical patterns of institutional responses match our theoretical expectations based on desk research and semi‐structured interviews with key Lithuanian policymakers. The main system‐wide change in Lithuania's crisis management system was the introduction of vertical and horizontal coordination arrangements, consistent with the logic of consequentiality and the dynamics of system complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70068
Primary Topic
Public Administration and Political Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Polycrisis and Systemic Change in Lithuania: From Fragmentation to Integration

Ramūnas Vilpišauskas, Vitalis Nakrošis
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Public Administration and Political Analysis
article

The Polycrisis and Systemic Change in Lithuania: From Fragmentation to Integration

Ramūnas Vilpišauskas, Vitalis Nakrošis
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The main purpose of the article is to assess the impact of two interconnected crises—COVID‐19 and irregular migration—on systemic change in Lithuania between 2020 and 2024. We examine how the country's response to the polycrisis has led to reforms in its crisis management system. Our theoretical framework integrates ideas from new institutionalism, complexity theory, and multi‐level governance to examine the impact of a polycrisis characterised by the simultaneous pressures of a global pandemic and authoritarian hybrid aggression, which constitutes the article's main conceptual novelty. Focusing on Lithuania, the article draws on comparative results of two case studies. Methodologically, these studies employ the process tracing method to assess how empirical patterns of institutional responses match our theoretical expectations based on desk research and semi‐structured interviews with key Lithuanian policymakers. The main system‐wide change in Lithuania's crisis management system was the introduction of vertical and horizontal coordination arrangements, consistent with the logic of consequentiality and the dynamics of system complexity.

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public PolicyVol. 17(4)
International Business School at Vilnius University (LT), European Humanities University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Administration and Political Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.